RPF
May 4th, 2008, 09:37
Hi guys. I was observing my GS for a long time trying to figure out the double pulse stepper design.
After a few months, I think I have finally nailed the difference to a normal stepper.
By placing the vantage point on the small overshoot second hand (the other side of the cannon pinion) the abrupt stopping of the second hand at the end of each pulse is reduced and there is less "stutter" (for want of a better word) overall. (i.e., a smoother movement in between each second)
In essence, what I think is happening is this. Instead of a velocity curve that looks like Mt. Everest (or a rollercoaster), the double pulse stepper results in a more elegant plateau shaped curve. The average velocity remains the same but the max. velocity is lower.
Am I totally off kilter here?
After a few months, I think I have finally nailed the difference to a normal stepper.
By placing the vantage point on the small overshoot second hand (the other side of the cannon pinion) the abrupt stopping of the second hand at the end of each pulse is reduced and there is less "stutter" (for want of a better word) overall. (i.e., a smoother movement in between each second)
In essence, what I think is happening is this. Instead of a velocity curve that looks like Mt. Everest (or a rollercoaster), the double pulse stepper results in a more elegant plateau shaped curve. The average velocity remains the same but the max. velocity is lower.
Am I totally off kilter here?