Dang, that's a small watch!

[ronlgmt]

My first Omega was a 3570.50 moon watch. I followed it up with a Mark 4.5 which is a similar size then went looking for a day-date. A number of conversations on the board seemed to prefer a 3520.50 over a 3220 because the 3220 had too much bling.

I guess I didn't do my research as well as I should have, because the 3520.50 looks like a baby when sitting next to the 3570. Is is just me?

[Xaltotun]

I believe this is the same case size as the "Reduced" models, such as my own L.A. Olympics Commemorative.

Yes, it's smaller by a few millimeters.

[bayerische]

Is that the "Reduced" or are they the same size?
I was amazed at how small the Reduced model is when I first saw it. I said to the clerk, no thanks that's a women's watch. :D

[Mize]

Something tells me it's 39mm vs the Speedy Pro at 42mm. It still amazes me how much a millimeter or two can make a difference when comparing watches of different sizes.

[ronlgmt]

Something tells me it's 39mm vs the Speedy Pro at 42mm. It still amazes me how much a millimeter or two can make a difference when comparing watches of different sizes.
I believe that you are correct. The face even states Speedy and not Pro.

[Pascal S]

Well, there's always the Grail... ;-)

I'm outta here.