|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|||||||
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Reference Material Dive watch reference material |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#13 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western Hemisphere
Posts: 4,491
|
There are two ISO standards relating to water resistant watches, everyone here seems to know about ISO 6425, BUT I think you are overlooking the ISO 2281 standard.
**NOT ALL 300 m WATER RESISTANT WATCHES ARE EQUAL IN WATER RESISTANCE** ISO 6425 standards set forth minimum requirements for mechanical watches* - a unidirectional bezel with elapse minute markings, visability at 25 cm in total darkness, indication that the watch is running in total darkness, shock and magnetic resistance, thermal shock resistance, and a minimum of 100 meter depth rating. The testing of the last item is where things begin to differ from non-dive watches. Water resistance testing of a diver's watch consists of: -immersed in 30 cm of water for 50 hrs, -immersed in water under 125% rated pressure with a force of 5 N perpendicular to the crown and buttons (if any) for 10 minutes. -immersed in 30cm of water at the following temperatures for five minute each, 40 C, 5 C and 40 C again, with the transition between temperature not to exceed 1 minute, and -immersion of the watch in a suitable pressure vessel and subjecting it to 125% of the rated pressure for 2 hrs, no evidence of water intrusion is allowed. When a watch is tested IAW ISO 2281, it is subject to: -immersed in 10cm of water for 1 hour, -immersed in 10cm of water with a force of 5 N applied perpendicular to the crown and buttons (if any) for five minutes, -immersed in 10cm of water at the following temperatures for five minute each, 40 C, 20 C and 40 C again, and -and immersed and subjected to an overpressure equal to the rated pressure (6 ATM in this case) for 10 minutes. You can see that there is a big difference in what is require between the two standards. If a watch does not have a rotating bezel it is automatically disqualified from being a "true Diver's", but the question is, do they perform the remainer of the tests required by ISO 6425, or do they use the more relaxed standards of ISO 2281? _________________ *quartz and digital have slightly differing readablity requirements. Last edited by lysanderxiii; October 31st, 2006 at 20:17. |
||
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|