Hardlex vs Sapphire
Like Tree9Likes

Thread: Hardlex vs Sapphire

-->
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 44
  1. #1
    Member UTC-8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    California
    Posts
    220

    Hardlex vs Sapphire

    I've recently become interested in some of the Seiko mid to high range divers and noticed something. The Seiko divers that use a sapphire crystal cost thousands. Even the MM300 at $2400 USD uses Hardlex. I don't see sapphire until I get up into the 600m or 1000m divers.

    I have a Seiko JDM SARB021 that sports a sapphire crystal that cost $450.

    What exactly is Hardlex? Does it have a benefit over Sapphire?
    dhagard likes this.
    Seiko SARB0021 - Seiko SKX007K - G-Shock GW-5600J-1 - Steinhart Ocean GMT

  2. #2
    lvt
    lvt is offline
    Member lvt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    The dark side of the Moon
    Posts
    11,009

    Re: Hardlex vs Sapphire

    AFAIK Hardlex has better shock-resistance than sapphire but can be easily scratched.
    Ball - Casio (G-shock) - HMT - Longines - Parnis - Seagull - Tissot - Victorinox - Yema

  3. #3
    Member aladin_sane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Cedar Rapids, Iowa
    Posts
    1,299

    Re: Hardlex vs Sapphire

    Hardlex is hardened mineral glass. The plus is that it is less prone to shatter, the negative is it is more prone to scratching. I have changed a couple of my Seiko divers from hardlex to sapphire. I have never shattered a sapphire crystal, but I have scratched a hardlex one. Get the watch you want, and if you want scratch resistance, replace the crystal with sapphire.

  4. #4
    Member GTR83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Jakarta, Indonesia
    Posts
    2,465

    Re: Hardlex vs Sapphire

    Ironically, the sub-$400 Sporturas come equipped with sapphire crystals, and the SNDA59/63 Velatura (a massive quartz diver chronograph) also has one.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    291

    Re: Hardlex vs Sapphire

    Hardlex is also less reflective than sapphire. Personally I don't like sapphire unless its got an AR coating on it.

  6. #6
    Member aladin_sane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Cedar Rapids, Iowa
    Posts
    1,299

    Re: Hardlex vs Sapphire

    I like an AR coating on the inside. Putting an easily scratched coating on the outside of a nearly scratch proof crystal makes no sense to me.

  7. #7
    Member ErikP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    126

    Re: Hardlex vs Sapphire

    I'm with you. I have harlex watches with scratches - never scratched or broke a sapphire.

    Even a sapphire without AR is better than an scratched hardlex in my opinion.

  8. #8
    Member timetellinnoob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    2,049

    Re: Hardlex vs Sapphire

    I think that if you shatter a watch glass, you did something --or something happened to you-- that was going to break it no matter what. Just unfortunate, unpredictable accidents. I don't think there's any REAL prevention or protection from that.
    Anth
    SEIKO:SNDA67 chrono, SKX779 BM, SKX007 (mod), SNZG15 military, SKX/PMMM mod,
    6309-7040 (12/1980 rfrb/mod), 7002-7000 (7/1991 Loy's), SRP227 (mod w/
    StainlessShroud),
    SNXS79 5, SCC031 Solar Chrono, SNKL45 5, SNX993 5 (mod)...


  9. #9
    Member UTC-8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    California
    Posts
    220

    Re: Hardlex vs Sapphire

    Thanks for the help guys. I really love the Seiko designs, I just have a hard time dropping thousands on a watch that doesn't have a sapphire crystal (unless its a Speedy Pro). I do wear the SKX007 and so far no scratches, but it doesn't get any abuse. I guess if I did by a more expensive Seiko, It wouldn't be a beater anyway, so maybe Hardlex is ok. Hardlex is a dumb name though.
    Seiko SARB0021 - Seiko SKX007K - G-Shock GW-5600J-1 - Steinhart Ocean GMT

  10. #10
    Member ErikP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    126

    Re: Hardlex vs Sapphire

    Quote Originally Posted by timetellinnoob View Post
    I think that if you shatter a watch glass, you did something --or something happened to you-- that was going to break it no matter what. Just unfortunate, unpredictable accidents. I don't think there's any REAL prevention or protection from that.
    Agreed. And if you hit something hard enough to shatter the sapphire, but not the hardlex - I am betting the hardlex ain't too pretty afterward.

Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2