Nobody (whose opinion actually matters to me) has ever said anything about my Aquaracer 300M other than "it's beautiful" or similar
So I really don't care about what the Omega and Rolex owners think...
you probably missed this:
It doesn't affect all Aquaracers but it does sound like all that were made in that period were affected although it doesn't indicate whether the crown stem failure will exhibit itself in all of them.
i.e is it a random thing that will affect some examples from that production run or will all of them fail?
WIS Handbook, Chapter 1, Rules 1 and 2:
1. Tag Heuer never wins a poll. Should a member feel the need to express the desire to own one, he or she may be subject to ridicule and be ostracized.
2. Omega wins all polls. Should Omega not be mentioned as a selectable option, it is highly suggested that you still recommend the polling member purchase an Omega, preferably a Speedmaster with hesalite crystal to add extra character and a certain warmess to the dial.
Thought for the day: if watches and brands were people, how many of you would be racists?
Based on my experiences with the auto industry and similar issues they had with QA, it is probably random. The failure rates have been pretty low and every watch experiences a different life. Most will pass through their life with no problems, I strongly suspect.
If this were a safety issue in an automobile, US Federal regulations would require the recall of all of them... that's a good thingBut not terribly relevant... I sometimes feel I'm going to die for a watch but it has never really happened. LOL
.
"Forever is composed of nows." - Emily Dickinson
"The watch has to be surrounded by a history. You need more than just a great design. You need to create an atmosphere around the product.
Who is the company behind it? Why are they using this material?
People need to be able to identify the watch with themselves. It's based on emotion." - Ralph Furter
That's pretty much what I figured and that the apparent slow reaction was simply TAG Heuer collecting data (i.e reports of failures) in order to determine the origins of it.
I imagine it would be hard to locate a fault that only occurs in a small sample of watches made in a specific time period that are sold all around the world that are worn differently and possibly sold long after manufacture.
WIS Handbook, Chapter 1, Rules 1 and 2:
1. Tag Heuer never wins a poll. Should a member feel the need to express the desire to own one, he or she may be subject to ridicule and be ostracized.
2. Omega wins all polls. Should Omega not be mentioned as a selectable option, it is highly suggested that you still recommend the polling member purchase an Omega, preferably a Speedmaster with hesalite crystal to add extra character and a certain warmess to the dial.
Thought for the day: if watches and brands were people, how many of you would be racists?
I just picked up my first Tag I bought a Aquaracer ref # can1010. I have owned a Rolex Submariner 4 Breitlings a IWC and a Thomas Gref Oceanic and I can say that my Tag is just as nice as any of the watches I have owned. I was forced to sell my collection quite a few years ago due to a work injury but I recently sold my house and moved to Florida from Michigan and decided I deserved a new watch. I could have bought any watch in the $1000 to $5000 dollar range and looked at a lot of watches but the Aquaracer just kept calling to me and so far its been a great watch and very accurate in fact it has not varied at all since I bought it 2 weeks ago and I set it to the Atomic clock and checked it just a few minutes ago and its still the exact time. I bought mine from a AD and got 30% of retail and they said they will also service it or send it in for me if they can't fix in house so I am not to worried about having problems with customer service if there are any. I loved all my watches but the Rolex was my favorite and was very accurate for a automatic I had it where it would gain a second a day while I was wearing it and when I took it off I set it crown up and it lost a second so I never had to set it and I wore it for over a year like that. The other watches we accurate also but not as good as the Rolex. I was tired of having to have the automatics cleaned and the cost was another reason I went with a quartz movement this time. The Tag is the only watch I now own and I don't plan on buying anymore watches anytime soon so I hope it keeps going like it has been because I think its a great looking watch and is just as nice as any watch I have owned.
Caneman,
Where are you from in Michigan? I live about 15 miles west of Ann Arbor.
Your CAN1010 is a quartz Aquaracer, right? If so, your watch should be very accurate and shouldn't gain or lose time like an automatic. By the way, I became the proud owner of a CAN1010.BA0821 Aquaracer quartz chronograph myself on March 20th. I love my watch too and truly appreciate your praise of TAG when comparing it to other Swiss watches you have owned. I haven't owned any Swiss watches before my TAG but can't imagine them really being any better.
Rob
So.... You don't even own a TAG and, yet, you're expounding on the quality, or lack thereof, of TAG Heuer customer services and, in other threads, excoriating certain stripped crown issues? Hmm, I know where to file your contributions to the TAG Heuer portion of the watchuseek forum from now on. That's not so different from someone who doesn't own a Porsche telling everyone that Porsches suck or that Porsche provides terrible customer services.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)