Hey Gang...
I find a few of the Steinharts appealing, but don't want something too large for my 6.75" wrist. I figure my max lug-to-lug is about 54mm, since my Lum-Tec Bull 45's look fine on me. But I chalk this up to the fact that the Bull 45 has very short lugs and only measures 53mm tip to tip.
I like the 44mm Aviation (undecided as to auto versus hand wind) but wonder about the length of the lugs putting it out of reach for me.
The Triton is about 1mm less thick than the Aviation, but it's a 45mm case rather than the 44mm Aviation and, from photos, the Triton lugs appear even longer than the Aviation. Can anybody confirm this?
The Triton also outweighs the Aviation by a good margin. I think lighter watches tend to be more comfortable.
Maybe the Military is the best bet for me. It's a 42mm and only 12mm thick instead of 14mm+
No Triton, but this helpful thread from Downer illustrates the Aviation next to the Military pretty well: A few size comparisons for Tony A.H
Actual lug-to-lug outside measurements of the Aviation / Triton would be helpful. I've had a forum member tell me that their Military is 52mm lug-to-lug.
If you guys could post up some wrist shots of any of these models, along with your wrist size, it'd be super helpful.
Lastly, I guess any impressions of how these models 'wear' or feel when worn would also be appreciated. I know some smaller watches wear larger than they really are, just like some larger watches wear a bit smaller.
Thanks for any help! ~Larry





LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
) but wonder about the length of the lugs putting it out of reach for me.
Reply With Quote
