hey guys! just wanted to get your inputs. i just bought a rotary editions701c and i noticed that mine has a different back. instead of the 1895 engraved in the back, i have a quarter sized window that shows the movement. did i get a fake watch? thanks in advance!
to the mods-sorry if this is in the wrong forum.
If you think you bought a MkII, then I would be very worried that it is fake.
sorry but what is MkII? i'm not familiar with watch terms! lol and thanks for your reply tooOriginally Posted by Myron
This is the MKII forum, it's a watch brand.
Interloper. Lost, I'm sure.
Last edited by marchone; March 30th, 2012 at 05:03.
This is the wrong forum, and if you want to know if your's is a fake, why don't you "google" Rotary 701C and look at the photos of the watch. It would be hard to believe that they would fake a watch that sells on the internet in a dozen places for 119.00 USD!!
Divers - Pre Sub Doxa 300m Dive Watch - Sub 300T Professional (US Divers) - Ocean7 LM-7 Ploprof - Ocean7 LM-7 Plorof Pro Titanium -Rolex 1665 SD-Rolex 1680 -Rolex 16610 Submariner -Seiko Professional 600m "Tuna" - Seiko Professional 300m "Tuna"- Tudor 9411/0 Snowflake/ Blue Dial - MKII Stingray 60 - MKII Kingston Gilt/non date - MKII Kingston MKII Gilt/Date
Others- Rolex GMT 16750 - IWC Calatrava - Ocean7 LM-5 GMT
Myla's Favorite's Doxa Sub 200 Coralline, Omega Seamaster 120 - Rolex Datejust 18k/SS - Chronosport Panther - Maurice Lacroix - Omega 14k Mesh
I understand your pain.
I once showed up to a UFC championship in ballet tights by accident.
Johnny
Life is short. How sad to have realized in your death bed that you've worn a crappy watch as a "daily beater" for most of your days.
It apparently uses a Sea-gull ST-16, which is fine. But it does mean that a fake version of the watch would probably be pretty comparable to the real thing.
yeah it's probably a fake. A lot of fakes have clear backs to show off the movement.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote