Guys, I understand your reasons. It would be better if there would be consecutive rounds of votes, each eliminating some designs and in the end we have a chance to have a winner, that would win solely by your votes, without need for moderators intervention. I believe you also understand, that this would be so timeconsuming, that we cannot afford such system. Also, this would require so much work from us, people behind this project, that we could start asking money for it...
We could change the rules, so there would be a winner, if he reaches simple majority of 51%. But, there will be polls, where we would have more than two options, that means, that we could never achieve such majority. this was the case with case design poll.
I will think of a new system for voting, that would ensure that this project is based on common accord, not project management decision.
I hope you are not that much upset about this decision regarding Triton Case - there was 49/51 result and with saltyporks vote it would be 50/51. I know this was not exactly fair, the Nav-B has won over Triton by 2 votes, but still, I believe this decision was for the good of this project.
In the end, what special watch could we create with nav-B? There is so many watches on the market created around few Nav-B designs, that in the end, we would have a watch, that looks like tons of other watches, with the only slight difference of having serial number and maybe WUSSE engraved somewhere.
Guys, I know this decission cannot satisfy all of you. But, you can always buy some Nav-B uhr from Steinhart and you will always end up with very nice watch. Here, you have the possibility to get watch that will be totaly UNIQUE! And maybe in the future, Steinhart will release his own Triton FB watch, but WUSSE will be first! (at least I hope so... )
Common, lest get over this and I promise, we will do our best to find voting system, that will leave the decisions up to you.