Like Tree182Likes

Thread: Which Watch Brands Belong in the High-End Forum? Which Ones Do Not?

Page 17 of 57 FirstFirst ... 789101112131415161718192021222324252627 ... LastLast
Results 161 to 170 of 565
  1. #161
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    908

    Re: Which Watch Brands Belong in the High-End Forum? Which Ones Do Not?

    Quote Originally Posted by Stensbjerg View Post
    True AP,VC and PP have all used JLC movement and some of movements they make them self today and call inhouse is still based on JLC know-how
    JLC is for sure a watchmakers watch
    Based on your signature......I consider Grand Seiko's as high-end and would happily sell some of my Omega's (Luxury watches) to get one. Video Review of the Grand Seiko Spring Drive GMT SBGE001 - YouTube
    what say some of you?
    Hammy



    Omega Ω Seamaster Speedmaster Pro 3570.50 (for sale in Jun/Jul 13)
    Omega Ω Seamaster GMT 2234.50 (for my eldest)
    Omega Ω Seamaster co-axial Black Bond
    Bulova Precisionist Champlain (my throw on and go)


  2. #162
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    749

    Re: Which Watch Brands Belong in the High-End Forum? Which Ones Do Not?

    Quote Originally Posted by Hammondo View Post
    Based on your signature......I consider Grand Seiko's as high-end and would happily sell some of my Omega's (Luxury watches) to get one. Video Review of the Grand Seiko Spring Drive GMT SBGE001 - YouTube
    what say some of you?
    I also see Grand Seikos as high-end and I think Seiko has a value for money and a innovation (as we see with the SD technology)
    many others brands only can dream about.

    Just think of what hype and buzz a swiss made brand would have made if they hat come up with this idea,
    to me Seiko do not get enough kredit for what they do on many watch forums but as I hat said before we all have our preferences

    There is no doubt in my mind that all brand world wide has a great respect for Seiko they just don't say it out loud
    and to me thats says it all
    It's just a watch

  3. #163
    Member iim7v7im7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    1,160

    Re: Which Watch Brands Belong in the High-End Forum? Which Ones Do Not?

    Quote Originally Posted by Hammondo View Post
    Based on your signature......I consider Grand Seiko's as high-end and would happily sell some of my Omega's (Luxury watches) to get one. Video Review of the Grand Seiko Spring Drive GMT SBGE001 - YouTube
    what say some of you?
    I think that this thread has sort of lost its course from the original question. This forum is a catch all for "high-end" brands that do not have teir own forum at WUS. Grand Seiko are superb high end watches that should be discussed in the Seiko forum. I thought that this forum was for high-end brands without a seperate brand forum. Brands like:
    • A. Lange & Sohne (Richemont)
    • Audemars Piguet
    • Blancpain (Swatch Group)
    • Breguet (Swatch Group)
    • Cartier (Richemont)
    • Chopard
    • Girard-Perrgaux (Sowind)
    • Jacquet Droz (Swatch Group)
    • Montlanc (Richemont)
    • Patek Phillipe
    • Roger Dubuis (Richemont)
    • Vacheron Constantin (Richemont)
    • Ulysse Nardin

  4. #164
    Member TK-421's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Not at my post.
    Posts
    2,239

    Re: Which Watch Brands Belong in the High-End Forum? Which Ones Do Not?

    thanks for getting back on track.

    Quote Originally Posted by iim7v7im7 View Post
    I think that this thread has sort of lost its course from the original question. This forum is a catch all for "high-end" brands that do not have teir own forum at WUS. Grand Seiko are superb high end watches that should be discussed in the Seiko forum. I thought that this forum was for high-end brands without a seperate brand forum. Brands like:
    • A. Lange & Sohne (Richemont)
    • Audemars Piguet
    • Blancpain (Swatch Group)
    • Breguet (Swatch Group)
    • Cartier (Richemont)
    • Chopard
    • Girard-Perrgaux (Sowind)
    • Jacquet Droz (Swatch Group)
    • Montlanc (Richemont)
    • Patek Phillipe
    • Roger Dubuis (Richemont)
    • Vacheron Constantin (Richemont)
    • Ulysse Nardin

  5. #165
    Member TK-421's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Not at my post.
    Posts
    2,239

    Re: Which Watch Brands Belong in the High-End Forum? Which Ones Do Not?

    er, um, it's not a schtick.

    ps-i have nothing to deal with, i never bought an AP. i believe you that 35% of the cost is in the case, but that does not directly correlate to the retail price. there are watches with the same finish quality at half the price. the retail mark up is huge, the cost to make an AP is no more than many watches. the real cost is all the APs on the shirts of PGA players.

    Quote Originally Posted by craniotes View Post
    I think it's great that you've found many watches that are the equal of AP in terms of finishing for half the price. Considering that over 35% of the cost of every AP that leaves the factory goes into the finishing of the case and the movement, all of which is done by hand, that's pretty amazing. I hope that you've bought a few of them.

    Oh, and you're right, I can't deny that the dial layout of the Royal Oak Offshore Chronograph is similar to the Valjoux 7750, never mind that the registers don't correspond to one another, their internal architecture is completely different and there's no comparison in terms of movement finishing. Seriously, though, compare it with an ETA 2894 if you must, but drop the 7750 schtick already, because you're not doing yourself any favors here.

    Regards,
    Adam

    PS - You can talk to as many ADs and reps as you want, but objectively speaking, AP is a top-tier manufacture and is widely regarded as one of the best of the best by knowledgeable WIS the world over for good reason. Deal with it and move on; there are plenty of other windmills to tilt at.
    Janne likes this.

  6. #166
    Member craniotes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Manhattan
    Posts
    3,819

    Re: Which Watch Brands Belong in the High-End Forum? Which Ones Do Not?

    Hey, trooper, you're the one who went off track with your woefully misbegotten and quixotic mission to prove that AP was using Valjoux movements, and now that you've finally been shot down in that regard, you're attempting to imply that, what, an Anonimo's case finishing is the equal of an AP's? Please. (And if not your beloved Anonimo, then who?) So don't go trying to take the higher ground here, because no one is buying what you're selling. Oh, and trust me, we are all more than aware of the insane markups that go hand in hand with the luxury goods industry, but thanks for sharing anyway.

    Look, you want an opinion, fine, you've got it. Pity that it isn't an informed one, though.

    Regards,
    Adam

    PS - Still, I do hope that you bought some of those half-the-price-but-all-the-quality-of-AP watches you're going on about. What a bargain!

    PPS - AP's brand ambassadors aren't paid, but of course you already knew that.
    Last edited by craniotes; September 5th, 2011 at 01:27.
    Contemporary: AP Royal Oak Offshore Diver ref. 15703, AP Royal Oak Offshore Forged Carbon Diver ref. 15706, AP Royal Oak "Jumbo" ref. 15202, IWC Aquatimer 2000 ref. 3538, IWC Aquatimer Chrono "Galapagos" ref. 3767, IWC Ingenieur ref. 3227-01, IWC Top Gun Big Pilot Perpetual Calendar ref. 5029, JLC Navy SEALs Diving Alarm Incursion, JLC Tribute to 1931 Reverso US Edition, Panerai PAM 372, Rolex Submariner 16800 matte-dial, Seiko SSC021, Sinn 142St PVD
    Vintage: Doxa, Omega Seamaster DeVille (2), Tudor Submariner 9411/0 "Blue Snowflake", Benrus/Bulova/Elgin
    G-Shock: DW-5600BB-1ER "Basic Black", DW-6900MT-7ER "Be@rbrick", DW-6900CL-4CR "Clot", DW-6900KR-8JR "Krink",
    DW-6900FS "Ultraseven 45th Anniversary", DW-9100BJ-2A "Riseman", GA-110DR-1A "Dee and Ricky", GA-111DR-7A "Dee and Ricky", GDF-100BB "Basic Black", GLX-150-4DR "G-Lide", GT-000 "G-Cool", GW-5000-1JF "Origins", GWM-5600TH-1 "The Hundreds", GXW-56-3JF "Khaki Green", GXW-56-4JF "Orange King"



  7. #167
    Member Aliisloo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    575

    Re: Which Watch Brands Belong in the High-End Forum? Which Ones Do Not?

    Quote Originally Posted by TK-421 View Post
    er, um, it's not a schtick.

    ps-i have nothing to deal with, i never bought an AP. i believe you that 35% of the cost is in the case, but that does not directly correlate to the retail price. there are watches with the same finish quality at half the price. the retail mark up is huge, the cost to make an AP is no more than many watches. the real cost is all the APs on the shirts of PGA players.
    In all fairness, it is hard to argue against AP being a high end. You might not like the aesthetics of some of the ROO models and too many LEs associated with rather mediocre celebrities diluting the brand (Jarno Trulli? seriously? What were you thinking AP!). But the place of AP in high horology is undisputed with their contribution in design, complications or straight up great looking dress watches like current Jules Audemars range.

    By the way, I read somewhere that celebrities associated with LEs are not paid anything by AP. In fact they come to AP for the request to make a limited edition most of the time. I don't know same is true for those who are simply sponsored, like PGA golfers. I doubt any golfer will wear a badge without paid!

    Ali

  8. #168
    Member craniotes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Manhattan
    Posts
    3,819

    Re: Which Watch Brands Belong in the High-End Forum? Which Ones Do Not?

    Nope, the golfers aren't paid either. In some instances they're already fans of the brand and collectors themselves, and in others AP donates to charities of their choosing.

    Regards,
    Adam
    Contemporary: AP Royal Oak Offshore Diver ref. 15703, AP Royal Oak Offshore Forged Carbon Diver ref. 15706, AP Royal Oak "Jumbo" ref. 15202, IWC Aquatimer 2000 ref. 3538, IWC Aquatimer Chrono "Galapagos" ref. 3767, IWC Ingenieur ref. 3227-01, IWC Top Gun Big Pilot Perpetual Calendar ref. 5029, JLC Navy SEALs Diving Alarm Incursion, JLC Tribute to 1931 Reverso US Edition, Panerai PAM 372, Rolex Submariner 16800 matte-dial, Seiko SSC021, Sinn 142St PVD
    Vintage: Doxa, Omega Seamaster DeVille (2), Tudor Submariner 9411/0 "Blue Snowflake", Benrus/Bulova/Elgin
    G-Shock: DW-5600BB-1ER "Basic Black", DW-6900MT-7ER "Be@rbrick", DW-6900CL-4CR "Clot", DW-6900KR-8JR "Krink",
    DW-6900FS "Ultraseven 45th Anniversary", DW-9100BJ-2A "Riseman", GA-110DR-1A "Dee and Ricky", GA-111DR-7A "Dee and Ricky", GDF-100BB "Basic Black", GLX-150-4DR "G-Lide", GT-000 "G-Cool", GW-5000-1JF "Origins", GWM-5600TH-1 "The Hundreds", GXW-56-3JF "Khaki Green", GXW-56-4JF "Orange King"



  9. #169
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Middle of Hurricane Alley
    Posts
    20,764

    Re: Which Watch Brands Belong in the High-End Forum? Which Ones Do Not?

    Some brands are manufacturing only High End Pieces. Those are easy to call High End>
    The problem arises on brands like IWC even Omega. In IWC's case, some movements are ETA, some not. Omega, I believe use maily movements based on ETA? But, they make some truly astonishing pieces, very High End!

    What abour Rolex?

  10. #170
    Member Lencoth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    779

    Re: Which Watch Brands Belong in the High-End Forum? Which Ones Do Not?

    I would find it much easier to establish what watches are high-end than brands.......

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •