Thread: Amazing "stuff" from NIST... (atomic clocks)

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Member Bob@Orlando's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    465

    Off Topic post Amazing "stuff" from NIST... (atomic clocks)

    I hardly pretend to understand all of this, but the numbers are fascinating. I pasted this from the NIST web site.

    BOULDER, Colo.- An atomic clock that uses an aluminum atom to apply the logic of computers to the peculiarities of the quantum world now rivals the world's most accurate clock, based on a single mercury atom. Both clocks are at least 10 times more accurate than the current U.S. time standard.

    The quantum logic clock, which derives its ticks from the natural vibrations of an aluminum ion (electrically charged atom). The aluminum ion is trapped together with one beryllium ion inside the copper-colored chamber in the foreground.

    Credit: Copyright Geoffrey Wheeler

    The measurements were made in a yearlong comparison of the two next-generation clocks, both designed and built at the Commerce Department's National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The clocks were compared with record precision, allowing scientists to measure the relative frequencies of the two clocks to 17 digits-the most accurate measurement of this type ever made. The comparison produced the most precise results yet in the worldwide quest to determine whether some of the fundamental constants that describe the universe are changing slightly over time, a hot research question that may alter basic models of the cosmos.

    The research is described in the March 6 issue of Science Express.* The aluminum and mercury clocks are both based on natural vibrations in ions (electrically charged atoms) and would neither gain nor lose one second in over 1 billion years-if they could run for such a long time-compared to about 80 million years for NIST-F1, the U.S. time standard based on neutral cesium atoms.

    The mercury clock was first demonstrated in 2000 and is now four times better than its last published evaluation in 2006, thanks to ongoing improvements in the clock design and operation. The mercury clock continues its reign as the world's most accurate for now, by a margin of 20 percent over the aluminum clock, but the designers say both experimental clocks could be improved further.

    "The aluminum clock is very accurate because it is insensitive to background magnetic and electric fields, and also to temperature," says Till Rosenband, the NIST physicist who built the clock and is the first author of the new paper. "It has the lowest known sensitivity of any atomic clock to temperature, which is one of the most difficult uncertainties to calibrate."

    Both the aluminum clock and the mercury clock are based on ions vibrating at optical frequencies, which are 100,000 times higher than microwave frequencies used in NIST-F1 and other similar time standards around the world. Because optical clocks divide time into smaller units, they can be far more precise than microwave standards. NIST scientists have several other optical atomic clocks in development, including one based on thousands of neutral strontium atoms. The strontium clock recently achieved twice the accuracy of NIST-F1, but still trails the mercury and aluminum clocks.

    Highly accurate clocks are used to synchronize telecommunications networks and deep-space communications, and for satellite navigation and positioning. Next-generation clocks may also lead to new types of gravity sensors, which have potential applications in exploration for underground natural resources and fundamental studies of the Earth.

    Laboratories around the world are developing optical clocks based on a variety of different designs and atoms; it is not yet clear which design will emerge as the best candidate for the next international standard.

    The new paper provides the first published evaluation of the operational quantum logic clock, so-named because it is based on the logical reasoning process used in quantum computers (see sidebar below for details). The clock is a spin-off of NIST research on quantum computers, which grew out of earlier atomic clock research. Quantum computers, if they can be built, will be capable of solving certain types of complex problems that are impossible or prohibitively costly or time consuming to solve with today's technologies.

    The NIST quantum logic clock uses two different kinds of ions, aluminum and beryllium, confined closely together in an electromagnetic trap and slowed by lasers to nearly "absolute zero" temperatures. Aluminum is a stable source of clock ticks, but its properties cannot be detected easily with lasers. The NIST scientists applied quantum computing methods to share information from the aluminum ion with the beryllium ion, a workhorse of their quantum computing research. The scientists can detect the aluminum clock's ticks by observing light signals from the beryllium ion.

    NIST's tandem ion approach is unique among the world's atomic clocks and has a key advantage: "You can pick from a bigger selection of atoms," explains NIST physicist Jim Bergquist, who built the mercury clock. "And aluminum has a lot of good qualities-better than mercury's."

    An optical clock can be evaluated precisely only by comparison to another clock of similar accuracy serving as a "ruler." NIST scientists used the quantum logic clock to measure the mercury clock, and vice versa. In addition, based on fluctuations in the frequencies of the two clocks relative to each other over time, NIST scientists were able to search for a possible change over time in a fundamental quantity called the fine-structure constant. This quantity measures the strength of electromagnetic interactions in many areas of physics, from studies of atoms and molecules to astronomy. Some evidence from astronomy has suggested the fine-structure constant may be changing very slowly over billions of years. If such changes are real, scientists would have to dramatically change their theories of the fundamental nature of the universe.

    The NIST measurements indicate that the value of the fine-structure constant is not changing by more than 1.6 quadrillionths of 1 percent per year, with an uncertainty of 2.3 quadrillionths of 1 percent per year (a quadrillionth is a millionth of a billionth). The result is small enough to be "consistent with no change," according to the paper. However, it is still possible that the fine-structure constant is changing at a rate smaller than anyone can yet detect. The new NIST limit is approximately 10 times smaller than the best previous measurement of the possible present-day rate of change in the fine-structure constant. The mercury clock is an especially useful tool for such tests because its frequency fluctuations are magnified by any changes in this constant.


    The work described in the new Science Express paper was supported in part by the Office of Naval Research and Disruptive Technology Office.

    As a non-regulatory agency of the Commerce Department, NIST promotes U.S. innovation and industrial competitiveness by advancing measurement science, standards and technology in ways that enhance economic security and improve our quality of life.


    Background: Where the 'Quantum Logic Clock' Gets Its Name


    The NIST quantum logic clock is so named because it borrows techniques that are key to quantum computers, which would solve problems using quantum mechanics, nature's instruction book for the smallest particles of matter and light. Logic is reasoning that determines an action or result based on which one of different possible options is received as input. In the NIST clock, the input options are two different quantum states, or internal energy levels, of an aluminum ion. Information about this state is transferred to a beryllium ion, which, depending on the input, produces different signals that are easily detected.

    NIST scientists use lasers to cool the two ions which are held 4 thousandths of a millimeter apart in an electromagnetic trap. Aluminum is the larger of the two ions, while the beryllium emits light under the conditions of this experiment. Scientists hit the ions with pulses from a "clock laser" within a narrow frequency range. If the laser frequency is at the center of the frequency range, the precise "resonance frequency" of aluminum, this ion jumps to a higher energy level, or 1 in the binary language of computers. Otherwise, the ion remains in the lower energy state, or 0.

    If there is no change in the aluminum ion, then another laser pulse causes both ions to begin rocking side to side in unison because of their physical proximity and the interaction of their electrical charges. An additional laser pulse converts this motion into a change in the internal energy level of the beryllium ion. This pulse reverses the direction of the ion's magnetic "spin," and the beryllium goes dark, a signal that the aluminum remained in the 0 state.

    On the other hand, if the aluminum ion jumps to the higher energy level, then the additional laser pulses fail to stimulate a shared rocking motion and have no effect on the beryllium ion, which keeps emitting light. Scientists detect this light as a signal that the aluminum ion jumped from 0 to 1.

    The goal is to tune the clock laser to the exact frequency that prompts the aluminum to jump from 0 to 1. The actual measurement of the ticking of the clock is provided not by the ions but rather by the clock laser's precisely tuned center frequency, which is measured with a "frequency comb," a tool for measuring very high optical frequencies, or colors of light.
    "If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, would it?"

    Albert Einstein (1879-1955)


  2. #2
    Member BenL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    HKG
    Posts
    35,185

    Re: Amazing "stuff" from NIST...

    Hehe, wonder when we'll be seeing quantum logic G-Shocks.

  3. #3
    Member onrypt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    1,623

    Re: Amazing "stuff" from NIST...

    "….and would neither gain nor lose one second in over 1 billion years…."

    If I live half that long I'd be happy. Either the sun will supernova or the resin will rot on my 5600j. Any odds on which happens first?
    And I just thought aluminum was good for keeping the cheese from dripping off onto my cookie sheet when I reheat 2 slices of pizza.
    All kidding aside, nice post and good read but I have a couple of questions…
    NIST scientists use lasers to cool the two ions which are held 4 thousandths of a millimeter apart in an electromagnetic trap. Aluminum is the larger of the two ions, while the beryllium emits light under the conditions of this experiment. Scientists hit the ions with pulses from a "clock laser" within a narrow frequency range. If the laser frequency is at the center of the frequency range, the precise "resonance frequency" of aluminum, this ion jumps to a higher energy level, or 1 in the binary language of computers. Otherwise, the ion remains in the lower energy state, or 0.
    1. If Aluminum doesn't respond to magnetism how does this work? I realize it says ions are held by the "magnetic" trap, but I don't understand. (Ions respond, but the original atom doesn't?, The author states that the reason aluminum works is b/c it doesn't respond to magnetism or changes in temp)
    2. This test would solely rely on the accuracy of the "narrow"frequency range of the "clock laser." (Frequency = off, then results = off. If the frequency range is a known constant why don't we just measure that instead of hitting ions that are in an electromagnetic trap with it?
    Rhetorical questions that are way above my pay grade, but I don't understand, lol
    "Finish each day and be done with it. You have done what you could. Some blunders and absurdities no doubt crept in; forget them as soon as you can.
    Tomorrow is a new day; begin it well and serenely and with too high a spirit to be encumbered with your old nonsense." -
    Ralph Waldo Emerson
    (Armida A1 Br, Casio (multiple G's), Dagaz (Tsunami PVD, Zero I Snowflake), Halios Bluering, Helson Ti Stingray, Seiko (Custom Monster, Sushi Feb '69, custom 6309 X2)
    Special thanks to Jay, Duarte, Zack, Jake, Peter and Chris....Gentlemen, you keep horology alive, thank you.
    if you know who all of the above are you're as sick as I am!!!
    This sig was made with 99.998% recycled electrons....

  4. #4
    Member rogerlike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    668

    Re: Amazing "stuff" from NIST...

    Quote Originally Posted by onrypt View Post
    but I have a couple of questions
    I'll have a go at answering them for you!

    The electromagnetic trap: an ion has a net electrical charge since it has a different number of electroncs than necessary to make it neutrally charged. It can be +ve or -vely charged. An ion with fewer electrons than for neutral with have a net +ve charge and will repel other +ve charges. So enclose a +ve ion with +ve charges and it will stay put, ish. An ion will stay away from the sides of it's trap if they are the same charge. This is generally true for any ion. Magnetic properties of a bulk material are a little different. For a material to be ferromagnetic (like Iron) the little magnetic fields (created by the ion's relevant electrons) of many ions like to align themselves in the same direction, without an external field, and produce a macroscopic effect.

    Going back to the clock stability, the resonant frequency of the aluminium ion corresponds to the energy needed for the ion to be excited from its initial state into a higher energy state. That is the thing that gives the clock its stability, and you want it to be as independent as possible from external influences such as temperature change and magnetic fields etc. When the energy of a incoming photon matches the transition energy (i.e. the frequencies match), the aluminium ion absorbs it and gets a little more energetic. The frequency the aluminium ion actually 'sees' is dependent on its relative motion to the laser beam, which is one reason why it needs to be so cold. The absorption happens within the electronic structure of the ion (the electrons), and not the nucleus.

    The clock laser: The clock works by tuning the laser to match the resonant frequency of the aluminium ion, and then measuring the laser's frequency. The feedback for tuning the laser is given by the magnesium partner ion: you want the magnesium ion to emit light as often as possible, and then you know the frequency matches that of the aluminium ion transition.

    (Magnesium is now used instead of beryllium.)

    I hope that makes some sense, and I'm pleased you didn't ask about the physics of quantum logic! The clever bit is how the magnesium ion is made to emit light when the aluminium ion gets excited.

    BTW, Sol isn't big enough to ever supernova. In about 5 billion years it will expand and turn into a red giant, possibly engulfing Earth, shed most of it's mass and eventually cool into a white dwarf. However, Earth will probably be too hot to support water, and life, in about 1 billion years!

  5. #5
    Member Bob@Orlando's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    465

    Re: Amazing "stuff" from NIST...

    This is way over my head. I was pleased that I figured out how to set the hourly alert on my watch. All this technology, and they still can't design a pizza with a non slip cheese topping.
    "If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, would it?"

    Albert Einstein (1879-1955)


  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    265

    Re: Amazing "stuff" from NIST...

    Bob, this is so very cool! Thanks for sharing.

    Rogerlike, thanks for the explanation too. Really clear and understandable. Nice job!

  7. #7
    Member onrypt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    1,623

    Re: Amazing "stuff" from NIST...

    Thanks Rogerlike,
    more proof that those with physics backgrounds can teach those of us with biology backgrounds a thing or two.
    I understand ions but getting beyond the basics……
    If you ever need help with the Kreb's Cycle let me know…..wait, on second thought I really don't want to revisit it, lol.
    Cheers,
    C.
    P.S., I think resin rot wins, hands down
    "Finish each day and be done with it. You have done what you could. Some blunders and absurdities no doubt crept in; forget them as soon as you can.
    Tomorrow is a new day; begin it well and serenely and with too high a spirit to be encumbered with your old nonsense." -
    Ralph Waldo Emerson
    (Armida A1 Br, Casio (multiple G's), Dagaz (Tsunami PVD, Zero I Snowflake), Halios Bluering, Helson Ti Stingray, Seiko (Custom Monster, Sushi Feb '69, custom 6309 X2)
    Special thanks to Jay, Duarte, Zack, Jake, Peter and Chris....Gentlemen, you keep horology alive, thank you.
    if you know who all of the above are you're as sick as I am!!!
    This sig was made with 99.998% recycled electrons....

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •