Like Tree2Likes
  • 2 Post By conjurer

Thread: Impressions of Seiko SKX175

Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Seattle area.
    Posts
    611

    Impressions of Seiko SKX175

    I got a holiday catalogue for Ben Bridge jewelers the other day; I'm still on their mailing list, I suppose, from the old, pre-Great Recession days when I used to get Mrs. Conjurer her Christmas and birthday jewelry there. Today, I get her baubles from my trustly local jeweler Aram, who is always there to fix my watchmaking screwups, which are legion. But I digress; the point here is that BB had some Rollies in the catalogue, including a Submariner in stainless--for over seven grand.


    You gotta be $#%&* kidding me!

    Back on planet Earth, I recently lucked into a BNIB Seiko 175 I got from a motivated seller; long story short, it got lost in the mail for four and a half months, I got a refund, then it showed up. I paid the seller again, and now it's all mine!


    A few particulars; it's about 42mm, about 13 or so thick. Inside is the same movement Seiko uses for a lot of their lower-end divers, the 7S26, 21 jewels (I think) with a 6 beat-per-second pulse. Nobody, I think, makes better economical dive watches than Seiko. You see then everywhere, and the 175, which was made for the North American market, is pretty popular. If you think of it as a toned-down Monster, you'll have the idea:




    Now, the 175's movement is non-handwindable and non-hackable, meaning to start it up--and I'll use my favorite Seiko automatic joke here--you have to shake it up like a meth-addict abusing his kid. Actually, a few shakes and the movement kicks in; wearing it all day, you'll have a full wind (shake?) on it, and the power reserve is said to be around 40 hours. I haven't measured it, since I've either been wearing it or keeping it on a winder. It's not a particularly accurate movement, either; I've owned three Monsters that have the same engine and none of them were better than +15 seconds a day, and this watch here isn't even that good; I haven't bothered to gauge it against my reference atomic clock, but from having to reset it after being in the winder for a couple of days, I'd guess it's about +30.

    The case is well made, nicely polished and brushed, and much simpler than the Monster's highly machined case. It looks a little less like a tool watch and a little more dressy because of this. The water resistance is still 200M, though; however, while the Monster is the same WR, it looks like it could easily do double that, while the 175 doesn't.

    The Pepsi-bezel is 120-click, lines up perfectly, and has a nice understated action to it--again, not quite as fluidly as the Monster, but better than, say, my Doxa 1000t, which sounds like the starter motor for a Trabant. There's a lume dot at the zero point of the bezel, per ISO standards. The dial, which doesn't show up well in these pictures, is actually a very dark blue in bright light, and looks black in everything else:



    The lume is outstanding; although not quite as good as the Monster, it's plenty bright:


    It lasts all night, and it easily passes the quick-look-inside-a-dark-car test (I've owned an astonishing number of divers that don't pass that test, BTW.) The hands are steel with the lume filling, and the seconds hand has the lume pip on the counterbalance, which at first looks strange but still works within the ISO standard for being able to tell if the watch is running.

    And now, the bracelet. Ahh, the bracelet:


    As you can see, there's a lot of play there. It's Jubilee style, with solid links on the outside rows and simple metal loops on the inside:


    As a result, it rattles like, well, a Trabant. There are a lot of people out there who absolutely hate this bracelet; there're at least a couple of folks out there who make a living--I suppose--by offering aftermarket bracelets for this particular model Seiko. I, however, like it. There's really no reason on Earth that this bracelet should be comfortable. With the way it's made, it should be chainsawing the hair off the wrist like Jay Browning from Ax Men on crack. But it doesn't. It's very supple, and conforms to the wrist very well:


    Now, in interest of full disclosure, I should mention that I wear my bracelets fairly snug; if you like a floppy watch, this bracelet could very well drive you totally nuts.

    This watch is the reason I love Seiko; no, it's not a Rollie Sub, but then, it doesn't pretend to be. A watch-lover who sees this on your wrist from twenty feet away will know, instantly, that it's a Seiko. They continue to make outstanding products that look super, work well, and last forever. You won't do a spit take when you open the box and see this watch for the first time, but you will come to appreciate it.
    jonasbry and Rocat like this.

  2. #2
    Member Ghobbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    737

    Re: Impressions of Seiko SKX175

    What a great review!
    Lots of droolable pics too - nice job!
    Ghobbit

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Seattle area.
    Posts
    611

    Re: Impressions of Seiko SKX175

    Quote Originally Posted by Ghobbit View Post
    What a great review!
    Lots of droolable pics too - nice job!
    Thanks, Ghobbit! Although that last picture has an unfortunate Walking Dead kind of feel to it.

  4. #4
    Member Ghobbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    737

    Re: Impressions of Seiko SKX175

    lol.

    Do post this review in the Seiko forum also.
    Ghobbit

  5. #5
    Member whatmeworry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Brighton, UK
    Posts
    7,465

    Re: Impressions of Seiko SKX175

    LMAO What a great review.
    Ball | Bulova | Casio | CWC | HMT | Invicta | Nomos | Omega | Orient | Rolex | Seagull | Seiko | Shanghai | Timex | Vostok

  6. #6
    Member VoiceOfSticks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Washington, DC, USA
    Posts
    462

    Re: Impressions of Seiko SKX175

    You are a very funny guy. Great review!
    Damasko DA36 (daily wearer)
    Casio G-Shock GW5600J-1

  7. #7
    Member captain kid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Groningen NL
    Posts
    1,070

    Re: Impressions of Seiko SKX175

    What's the difference between a SKX175 and a SKX009

    Edit.
    Never mind, found the answer myself.

    "One major difference, according to Ed Rader, is the color of the dials: The SKX175 has a dark gray dial and round markers (like that on an SKX007), while the SKX009 has a blue dial. But Bob Falfa says the SKX009 and SKX175 dials are identical in color; the difference is in the markings and country in which the models are marketed."
    Last edited by captain kid; December 2nd, 2010 at 15:20.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Seattle area.
    Posts
    611

    Re: Impressions of Seiko SKX175

    Quote Originally Posted by VoiceOfSticks View Post
    You are a very funny guy. Great review!
    Thanks, Greg!

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Seattle area.
    Posts
    611

    Re: Impressions of Seiko SKX175

    Quote Originally Posted by captain kid View Post
    What's the difference between a SKX175 and a SKX009

    Edit.
    Never mind, found the answer myself.

    "One major difference, according to Ed Rader, is the color of the dials: The SKX175 has a dark gray dial and round markers (like that on an SKX007), while the SKX009 has a blue dial. But Bob Falfa says the SKX009 and SKX175 dials are identical in color; the difference is in the markings and country in which the models are marketed."
    The dial on the 175 is definitely a very dark blue; I haven't seen an 009 to compare it against. However, in most lighting situations, the 175's dial looks either dark charcoal or black.

  10. #10
    Member Beau8's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Sunny California
    Posts
    23,192

    Re: Impressions of Seiko SKX175

    Congrats on a sporty/dive watch~Cheers!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •