For those who missed the back-story on how I got this watch, see this thread:
Karma: Free Shanghai Military 22J to WUS member
Thanks Dave and huge thanks to Alf and Alf's daughter
And now here it is:
You will notice that it is no longer on the steel bracelet. It's a an excellent bracelet but it's way too big. Also the pins are too stiff for me to shift so I might get it resized next week. Or maybe not. The Poljot Aviator strap that I put on it looks and feels good so I might just leave it that way and have something a little different from everybody else. ...Unless you all decide to copy me
I seriously adore this watch. No doubt about it. This was a classic design just crying out for a remake and the good people at Shanghai have done it right. Don't you just love it when the big corporations listen to the fanboys?
The watch has been on my wrist all weekend and is keeping excellent time.
The dial is amazingly legible in all lighting conditions, apart from the date. The very elegant pie-pan dial unfortunately puts the date at the bottom of a deep hole, and the cyclops lens doesn't help much. The DG28 is I guess a different shape to the original SS2 and SS4 movements. Not that I'm too worried as a flat dial just would not look right.
The lume lights up well after exposure to sunlight, but responds much less well to artificial light. The difference is surprising. Initial intensity is OK, but less than some cheap lumes out there. But the big happy surprise is that it stays lit all night! Yes, that's right, this is possibly the first Chinese photoluminescent dial with all-night capability. I'm delighted.
Other things to love about this watch: Classic old-school Chinese all-steel case design, but with rotating bezel and screw-down crown. That's a very rare combo. The friction bezel is a count-down type which is a first for me. It's easy to read and thin enough that you get a nice big dial on a relatively compact watch.
Here's the Shanghai with some other watches of various military pedigree:
The HMT Pilot is a loose homage to the watches that HMT built for the Indian air force. The Vostok Antimagnetic is a Soviet-era 200m mil-spec diver originally sold only in military shops. The Sunboro China Army Day piece is from the original year 2000 issue made available for sale to military personnel. Points of comparison: the HMT and Vostok both have pie-pan dials like the Shanghai. The Sunboro has the usual ratchet, count-up bezel, while the Vostok has a friction bezel that you can count any way that suits you.
Here's the Shanghai with it's People's Liberation Army brother:
Both are powered by a Dixmont-Guangzhou DG28 movement. The quality of DGs can vary but both mine are highly accurate, auto-wind smoothly with just a trace of noise (louder in the Shanghai), hack crisply, have no second hand stutter, and both quick-set the date smoothly.
Whereas the China Army Day watch has a commemorative inscription on the back, the Shanghai is so shiny you could comb your hair in it:
Some people have called the Shanghai a 'diver' but I'm not sure that was the original intent. Possibly it is simply made as a tough tool watch. Here's a comparison of the side views of the Shanghai and Vostok:
Notice that the crown is slightly bigger on the Vostok. Pretty much all of that diameter is used for improving the seal, whereas on the Shanghai, the crown is relatively large for the tube that it screws down on. I'm not sure what the original 1960s design was like, but in this reissue, the advantage of the bigger crown is more for ease of use while wearing gloves rather than fitting a big seal. While we're looking at the side, notice the shape of the case and compare it to any vintage Shanghai, Zhongshan, Sea-Gull, etc. Pure classic. And very comfortable to wear.
One more really nice thing about this watch is the domed glass:
While I wouldn't trust it as far as the massive, legendary Vostok acrylic crystal, it certainly does look a treat.
That's the thing about this watch. Everything looks just right. If you look close enough, you will spot evidence of budgetary constraints on the design process (e.g. the lume being printed over the dial batons instead of filling them), but considering that this watch required so much custom work to bring to production, and notwithstanding that they probably subcontracted it (why else use an outsourced movement?), this is a very, very impressive piece of work at the price it is offered.
Did I mention that I love this watch?
![]()



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks






Reply With Quote
RIP Noah Fuller
. The spring loading on the Shanghai is nicely weighted; only just as strong as it needs to be, unlike say a TAG-Heuer (or that Poljot). In my book, nothing compares to the famous Vostok 'wobbly crown', but I will cheerfully settle for Rolex or Seiko. This Shanghai is not up to those standards but I would unhesitatingly take it in preference to any TAG-Heuer (I've tried several).

