+2s/y would be phenomenal, even for a HAQ watch!
+2s/y would be phenomenal, even for a HAQ watch!
Collection:
A few of this and some of the other ...
"I worked my way up from nothing to a state of extreme poverty" - Groucho Marx
My EZchrono is under 2 s/y at the last measurement.
Still looking good:
Funny thing is, the more accurate the tracking, the more I want to wear it ...
HTH
"So?"
-Andrew Breitbart 1969-2012
I think I read that the watch uses a lithium 2016 battery and because of the sweeping second hand battery life is over a year.
For me this is not a problem since I have the watch tools and knowledge to open the back and change batteries.
After 16 weeks it's still running less than 0.5 seconds fast:
This week I found that I could observe the daily drift of my RC wall clock over the course of a day when comparing it to my Precisionist.
This is definitely the most accurate watch I have ever owned.
HTH
"So?"
-Andrew Breitbart 1969-2012
9 weeks on, and my Precisionist is less than 0.2 seconds fast. At this rate, about 1s/yr gain
Looks like the B1s are performing well, gaijin ...
Collection:
A few of this and some of the other ...
"I worked my way up from nothing to a state of extreme poverty" - Groucho Marx
Week 17 and it is now trending at <+1s/y:
![]()
"So?"
-Andrew Breitbart 1969-2012
Week 12, and it's now +0.1s - trending less than +1s/y as well!![]()
Collection:
A few of this and some of the other ...
"I worked my way up from nothing to a state of extreme poverty" - Groucho Marx
Still chugging along at a linear trend predicting <+1s/y:
I forgot to mention last week that I did NOT adjust for DST, so I have to imagine myself one hour ahead while wearing it.
HTH
"So?"
-Andrew Breitbart 1969-2012
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)