G-Shock No. 10, G-9000
Like Tree8Likes
  • 3 Post By tribe125
  • 1 Post By CERTomaz
  • 1 Post By G-shock1968
  • 1 Post By STEVIE
  • 1 Post By robertsa01
  • 1 Post By BenL

Thread: G-Shock No. 10, G-9000

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Member tribe125's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    29,513

    G-Shock No. 10

    It’s been out for a while, but I was more interested in buying a couple of other Gs. However, it seemed appropriate for my 10th G to be a Mudman. The GW looks like a bit of a dog’s dinner, so it had to be the plain vanilla version.

    First impressions: it does look slightly too small. Not in terms of overall size, but in terms of the dial. There’s a lot going on in there, and the general appearance is a bit fussy. It’s not a great design, to be honest. Sometimes I look at it, and all I see is a collection of white dots, letters, and numerals; then the dividing ‘arrow’; and only then the time and date. Compared to the DW-6900, DW-5600, or G-8000, the dial is a collection of parts, rather than a unified whole. This means that at a glance, your eyes don't fall upon the time digits, or the date.

    Some of the parts are a bit clumsy too, and are not terribly helpful. The silver trapezium, for example, houses a graphic seconds counter, the individual elements of which are too small to see. The little circle at the other end of the 'arrow' contains the 'on/off' indicator for the flash feature, which doesn't need to be permanently displayed.

    Then look at how little of the available space is given to the time and date. Casio can do these things very well, but on this watch has chosen (I imagine) to fill the dial with 'technical looking' details that contribute very little to the functionality of the design. None of this matters if you like the end result, but from an ergonomic point of view it's not a success.

    Feels well made though, and it’s certainly a proper tough-looking G. The red buttons are great. Good band too, and it’s a decent width (some of the tapering bands look a bit skinny to me).

    It doesn’t quite match the G-8000 for functions. Both are excellent, but the Mudman doesn’t show the time in stopwatch mode. It does, of course, have two fantastic stopwatches, but I’ll never use the additional stopwatch, or need to time something for 1,000 hours (minus 1/100th of a second...). The G-8000 displays the year, which I like (even if it’s hardly essential), but the Mudman has a fifth light button, which I prefer. Both have world time, and both have the newer, bigger list of countries (when I’m in Central Europe, I prefer to see BER on my watch - PAR doesn’t seem right). Ultimately, though, the G-8000 is a great design, and the Mudman isn’t.

    On the wrist, the Mudman doesn’t, to my eyes, look as good as a 6900. The watch I find myself comparing it to is the 2300 series - similar size, similar rugged appearance, both with extensive (but different) functions. Like others have said, if only the Mudman had solar power… all the same, I like it better than my 2310.

    So the Mudman is probably my ‘number 3’ watch. The 6900 is just ‘right’ in terms of size, layout and proportions, and is a true classic. The G-8000 has better functions than either, is a model of clarity, a brilliant piece of design, and is a classic in the making. The Mudman, good though it is, will never be a real classic. It does have those big red buttons though…

    Don’t think I’m knocking it – I knew what I was buying, and I like it - but it doesn't have what it takes to be an enduring design. As the 5600 shows, it's simple and timeless design that makes a classic. The appeal of this watch is in the frame, not the picture!

    Just what the world needs - another photo of a Mudman -




    It was the buttons that made me want it -

    Last edited by Sjors; August 22nd, 2006 at 19:59.
    1onehandwill, mitadoc and jascolli like this.
    I used to list my watches here until I realised it ruined people's Google searches...

  2. #2
    Member CERTomaz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    BULGARIA, Sofia
    Posts
    67

    Re: G-Shock No. 10, G-9000

    Man u r wrong - the G9000 is WICKED !!!
    It's the BEST for me, basic functions, extreme design and not at last place - those BIG RED BUTTONS - it's perfect - just perfect
    1onehandwill likes this.

  3. #3
    Member G-shock1968's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    803

    Re: G-Shock No. 10, G-9000

    The G-9000 is probly my favorite of all my Gs.I Like The Red Buttons.
    1onehandwill likes this.
    ]

  4. Remove Advertisements
    WatchUSeek.com
    Advertisements
     

  5. #4
    Member STEVIE's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,165

    Re: G-Shock No. 10, G-9000

    A department store here in my city has the G9000-1 on sale, reduced from AU$199 to AU$129 incl tax. I might pull the trigger on this.

    What do you guys think?

    At todays rate, AU$129 equals US$84.77 or 56.75 GBP
    1onehandwill likes this.


  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    12

    Re: G-Shock No. 10, G-9000

    I don't think it looks too gross especially if this is your prefered style of watch.
    I would personally never wear such a watch & the name "Mudman"; hell that puts me right off.
    As for the price well I never understood how Casio got away charging such prices for such watches.
    However each to his own, of the type I imagine Casio do it best.
    Pete

  7. #6

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    25

    Re: G-Shock No. 10, G-9000

    I recently bought this watch, and I love it! I did alot of research and this is the one that I liked the most. I actually like the red buttons after seeing it in person

    Very comfortable, well built feel in my opinion.
    1onehandwill likes this.

  8. #7
    Member BenL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    HKG
    Posts
    35,397

    Re: G-Shock No. 10, G-9000

    Quote Originally Posted by robertsa01 View Post
    I recently bought this watch, and I love it! I did alot of research and this is the one that I liked the most. I actually like the red buttons after seeing it in person

    Very comfortable, well built feel in my opinion.
    Congrats, robert. The watch is a great one!
    1onehandwill likes this.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

    Similar Threads

    1. My G Shock
      By Battlemoose in forum Casio G-Shock
      Replies: 12
      Last Post: August 14th, 2006, 01:51
    2. Who are the people wearing Kobold
      By bobacus in forum Kobold
      Replies: 18
      Last Post: August 4th, 2006, 16:14
    3. CASIO G SHOCK and the MILITARY
      By Mick no:8 in forum Casio G-Shock
      Replies: 10
      Last Post: July 20th, 2006, 22:07
    4. FS: G Shock Rare Casio MR G 130-Titanium CopperState 1000
      By kpaxsg in forum Watches - Private sellers and Sponsors
      Replies: 1
      Last Post: June 21st, 2006, 09:43
    5. GW 9000 New Model
      By OZZIE in forum Casio G-Shock
      Replies: 4
      Last Post: March 10th, 2006, 03:44

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •