GD-X6900 impressions
Like Tree6Likes
  • 5 Post By CdrShepard
  • 1 Post By ccm123

Thread: GD-X6900 impressions

Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Member CdrShepard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    217

    GD-X6900 impressions

    If you look at Casio's current stable of G-Shocks, it's clear that the literal growth of these watches is showing no signs of slowing down. I mean, a big watch means you get MORE watch for your money right? That's our subconscious talking. So, as the proud owner of a 6-inch wrist, here's my mini-review on one of the mainstays of the XL lineup from Casio G-Shock, the GD-X6900-1.

    Name:  20170605_235153.jpg
Views: 542
Size:  1.50 MB

    I have to admit, I was apprehensive at first about the 6900 for two reasons.
    1. Because the 6900 silhouette is THE most ubiquitous out of all the G-Shocks, to the general public. You don't feel like you're owning anything special or particularly cool.
    2. The way the band is designed makes it stick out from the bezel and case at a most impractical angle. Look at the resin beams that prevent the band from curving down at a steeper angle in the picture below.

    Name:  20170605_235013.jpg
Views: 526
Size:  1.28 MB
    As a side-note: Made in Thailand, which is nice. Southeast Asia represent! (Not that the location of an automated factory line matters to me...)

    That said, the 6900 (both the DW and the GDX) is the kind of watch that simply looks much, much better in person than in pictures, even the well-taken ones. It has a great mix of curved and angular surfaces that is absent from any other G-Shock that Casio has put out. So eventually I caved and got two DW's. So why get the GDX then?

    If you've looked at my past reviews and posts, you'll know that I'm a sucker for big batteries, not just for their lifespan but also for the power they provide to a digital watch's basic functions.
    The GDX has a 10-year battery, and probably as a result, also has one of the clearest positive AND negative displays around. It is also the loudest in my little collection so far. Also, world time and the dot-matrix day is another significant factor for me.

    Name:  20170606_001613.jpg
Views: 527
Size:  1.29 MB
    Here it is, along with my DW-D, another killer display, and the DW-6900ZB. The GD-X display is unfairly legible here because the light in centred on it - it's actually about the same as the DW-D.

    Now, how does it drive? Despite the obscene dimensions (57.5×53.9×20.4mm)... yes TWENTY millimeters thick, it doesn't really feel that big. If anything, the greatest contributor to the oversized feeling is the stupid band that sticks out way too much. Take a look. Remember, this is a 6-inch (flat) wrist.
    Name:  20170604_181054.jpg
Views: 528
Size:  1.27 MB

    The band does seem to cause the watch head and the band itself to squeeze the wrist, making it fairly secure despite the gaps at the lugs. In fact, it's quite a firm squeeze. I wonder how the bigger-wristed guys wear it without their wrists being compressed uncomfortably.

    Name:  20170605_233736.jpg
Views: 531
Size:  1.04 MB
    An mm or two actually comes from the case backplate, which does help it look slightly slimmer when worn.

    Aesthetically, the GDX shines, particularly this -1 model. It's supposed to be the basic model alongside the panda variant, but somehow it has ended up being one of the rarer ones.
    The -1 has a satin sheen to the resin, kind of a oily look to it. It looks fantastic on the 6900 resin, whereas on the bulbous and rounder GA-100CB I owned previously, it looked out of place.
    I love the little flashes of orange-yellow for the illuminator text and the main eye. Makes the watch look even more stealth than if it was completely monochrome, if that makes sense.
    The faceplate is actually a matte dark grey rather than a black. Or maybe it's black but the satin sheen of the resin makes it look lighter than it actually is.
    And my favourite - the buttons.
    Name:  20170605_235230.jpg
Views: 509
Size:  1.17 MB
    I really like the feel and look of the knurled plastic buttons. Their size over the DW buttons is also a plus, and the push action is really good as well. So yeah, if anything, the GDX is one good-looking watch.

    Name:  20170605_235302.jpg
Views: 490
Size:  670.4 KB
    Even the backlight is really good-looking. This is an LED - not EL.

    Functionality-wise, it's as any other "basic" digital G-Shock. Nothing impressive, nothing really lacking (apart from HT on the other screens but Casio needs a reason to sell DWs after all).
    A slight annoyance is the delay between screens when it shows you which function you're at. On the GDX, it seems to take about half a second longer than my other G's, like my GLX-5600. Yes, you get to see the three eyes do their crazy dance, but I want to use my timer NOW, dammit.

    Either way, the watch has its quirks and its flaws, but it's also easy to see why so many people like it as well. It looks good, wears good, works good. And it doesn't look out of place at all if you don't stare at it on my wrist.
    Name:  20170605_195425edit.jpg
Views: 493
Size:  217.6 KB
    ccm123, GaryK30, pckoh and 2 others like this.

  2. #2
    Member ccm123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Posts
    9,597

    Re: GD-X6900 impressions

    Nice review!
    pckoh likes this.
    If you don't think every day is a good day, just try missing one. ~Cavett Robert

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    2
    Hi. My first post, receive best wishes from Spain!!

    I once hade a GDX, but traded it for my beloved G6900. The reason is that I use to like watches that fit my wrist accordingly to its size. Don't like the GA series due to that reason.

    I still think the GDX is a impressive S. O. B., but It fits uncomfortable and tally on me. I don't have to care about hitting the bezel against my surroundings at home or anywhere.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

    Similar Threads

    1. Replies: 0
      Last Post: April 9th, 2014, 05:09
    2. Replies: 1
      Last Post: January 27th, 2014, 02:40
    3. Whatever happened to the GD-X6900?
      By carrot in forum Casio G-Shock
      Replies: 20
      Last Post: November 13th, 2013, 14:10
    4. GX-56 vs. GD-X6900
      By KillaSkill in forum Casio G-Shock
      Replies: 14
      Last Post: October 18th, 2013, 11:57
    5. Got it - GD-X6900
      By Bulldog in forum Casio G-Shock
      Replies: 28
      Last Post: October 13th, 2013, 01:44

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •