Npt that their spectacular or anything like that but these are my basic everyday silver dialed/SS autos. Its been hard for me to give them all equal wrist time despite liking them all almost equally. (If I had to pick one I would be very distraught if told the constellation had to go -even though I dropped it hard 2 days ago and it now needs a service)
So-the question is-if anybody cares-what,if any are the major differences? I don't mean in the movement. I know the rlx and Omega are cosc grade but in terms of style is it likely that to the general public they would come off as nearly identical? Does one over any other stand out to a wis? I just snagged a pretty sweet SM cal 342 with sub sec and I'm wondering if I'll find it even harder to wear them all and maybe one should go.
As a collector the logic goes:
1-Connie: never sell a connie period.(just mo)
2-DJ: its a rlx and its worth more. other people like it and its accurate as hell
3.Conquest-just started getting into Longines so it too early-only have 2
4.SM cal 490-I was told it was a cal 471 which was the 1st full rotor auto by O but it wasnt. I kept it anyway but its not an essential piece for a collection. But then I'm not really too sure what a small but 'essential' SM collection would involve. What bumper is the best, what rotor, etc.
sorry-just blathering and organizing photbkt albums
Oh-p.s.-does anybody think the Longines conquest and the DJ look as much alike(generally) as I do?