The G9000 vs the GW9010 help
Like Tree2Likes

Thread: The G9000 vs the GW9010 help

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    2

    The G9000 vs the GW9010 help

    I am looking to get my first gshock watch and need some help. Out of these two what is the majority winner.

    I have looked and read about them both. Having much trouble on deciding.

    Thank you all for the extra help.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    2,086

    Re: The G9000 vs the GW9010 help

    G 9000.
    I think.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    2

    Re: The G9000 vs the GW9010 help

    Quote Originally Posted by acello27 View Post
    G 9000.
    I think.
    Any reasons behind that?

  4. Remove Advertisements
    WatchUSeek.com
    Advertisements
     

  5. #4
    Member Riley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    3,043

    Re: The G9000 vs the GW9010 help

    They're both nice, but I think the G-9000 looks better.





    The GW-9010 has atomic and is more expensive. There's also a G-9010 that's non-atomic and cheaper with the same look.

    And don't forget about the atomic GW-9000 Mudman.


  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    2,086

    Re: The G9000 vs the GW9010 help

    Quote Originally Posted by acello27 View Post
    G 9000.
    I think.
    Better looking and half the price. The dial on my MC is great.
    And mine is +5 seconds a month.
    Also I wear mine when I sleep.
    Not good for syncing.
    And many versions! Meaning colors.
    I also like and use the 2 stop watches.
    Not sure if the new one can do this.
    That being said. I like the atomic one : )
    Get both eventually. I think I will.

  7. #6
    Member gettocard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    902

    Re: The G9000 vs the GW9010 help

    I'm a solar and multiband addicted guy that just for the Mudman's own beauty gave up it's bad habit.
    I own 2 Muddies both non solar and I absolutely tell you to go for the same.
    I'll buy the solar atomic too at some point ,but THE Mudman as intended it has to be the classic G9000,no fancy solar panels and radiocontrolled stuff. Besides that,both of my Mudmans are showing an impressive timekeeping record. +1 sec in 3 weeks sounds pretty accettable to me.
    Last edited by gettocard; September 14th, 2010 at 22:55.

  8. #7
    Member WIS_Chronomaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    12,381

    Re: The G9000 vs the GW9010 help



    I do prefer this one :)




  9. #8
    Member Bulldog1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Nuernberg, Germany
    Posts
    834

    Re: The G9000 vs the GW9010 help

    I absolutely love my GW-9010. It´s a great timepiece with outstanding functionality. I love the symmetry of it´s dial with the big G in the middle (someone once stated that it looks a bit like a cylon´s face from Battlestar Galactica ). The dial is extremely crisp an sharp, much more contrast than many other Gs and very legible digits. And not to forget I´m a big fan of solar watches and atomic timekeeping. No worry about using all the little gizmos as often as you want to, battery will refresh every time the watch gets some light.

    Having said that, I have to admit that I absolutely love my G-9000s. These are some handsome watches and they offer great functionality, too. Two chronographs measuring up to 1000 hours each, time shown in almost every mode (I really like that feature, especially when I use the CDT), CDT with repeat function and so on. The "dual illumination" of the whole dial gives it the best looking face of all Gs in the dark (just my 2c).

    So, if you ask - take both .



    Twins seperated at birth?





    Let there be light!

    Time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time.

  10. #9
    Member dkpw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    440

    Re: The G9000 vs the GW9010 help

    Quote Originally Posted by Riley View Post
    They're both nice, but I think the G-9000 looks better.





    The GW-9010 has atomic and is more expensive. There's also a G-9010 that's non-atomic and cheaper with the same look.

    And don't forget about the atomic GW-9000 Mudman.

    I agree - which is why I went for a G-9000.
    David
    Ω Speedmaster, Explorer 214270, Sub 16610, Seiko Shogun, Pepsi Turtle, PRS-29B
    Steinhart OVM, Citizens: Ray Mears 2 BN0151-09L & BN2017-02E,
    & far too many G-Shocks



  11. #10
    Member JonL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    nyc
    Posts
    4,055

    Re: The G9000 vs the GW9010 help

    Don't ask a bunch of Muddy addicts - we'll just say 'get both!'

    I love my Rally Mudman





    But also love the MX series probably just as much ...



    1onehandwill likes this.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

    Tags for this Thread

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •