Gw-9000 Vs Gw-9100

View Poll Results: WHAT DO YOU PREFER??

Voters
92. This poll is closed
  • GW-9000 MUDMAN

    47 51.09%
  • GW-9100 GULFMAN

    45 48.91%

Thread: Gw-9000 Vs Gw-9100

Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 48
  1. #1
    Member ADAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    1,680

    Gw-9000 Vs Gw-9100

    I love this models...but I prefer...????



  2. #2
    Member Klaus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Munich
    Posts
    647

    Re: Gw-9000 Vs Gw-9100

    Hi,

    gw-9000 !

    i prefer the all plastik and the rubber back !
    That makes the great comfort on the wrist..

    servus
    Klaus

  3. #3
    Member tribe125's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    29,513

    Re: Gw-9000 Vs Gw-9100

    Easy one for me, because I've always found the Mudman display to be clumsy and unattractive. Mainly because of the five eyes, but I don't like the indicator 'lists' either.
    I used to list my watches here until I realised it ruined people's Google searches...

  4. Remove Advertisements
    WatchUSeek.com
    Advertisements
     

  5. #4
    Member robocopu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Paris, France
    Posts
    809

    Re: Gw-9000 Vs Gw-9100

    the gulfman does it for me , is just better than the mudman , between these models of course !
    Not Enough Time !



    Mike!

  6. #5
    Member bluegum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    brisbane, australia
    Posts
    5,160

    Re: Gw-9000 Vs Gw-9100

    I prefer the Gulfman too, but you should go with your first instinct or you'll probably end up having buyer's remorse.

    This is all purely taste...buy what suits your tastes the most, and screw everyone else...hehe, ok, you know what I mean.

  7. #6
    Member cal..45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    CMOWE (Central Madhouse Of Western Europe)
    Posts
    8,512

    Re: Gw-9000 Vs Gw-9100

    I would prefer the gulfman by far over the mudman, because it just looks way better for me. unfortunately (its a real shame) the lack of the fifth (light) button makes the watch totally uninteresting for me, so I would go with the mudman. but then rather with a G-9000 than with the GW-9000.


    regards, holger

  8. #7
    Member FrogmanFreak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,319

    Re: Gw-9000 Vs Gw-9100

    i'll go for the GW9000 mudman. lovely on my wrist!

  9. #8
    Member hoochy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Wigan, UK
    Posts
    2,223

    Re: Gw-9000 Vs Gw-9100

    It's a very close call and I posted a similar thread a while back, the Gulfman won! The Mudman is very slick though!

    Watches are frickin evil!

  10. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Seattle, WA, USA
    Posts
    483

    Re: Gw-9000 Vs Gw-9100

    Mudman.

    I prefer the Mudman style, and I don't like all the metal on the bezel of the Gulfie.

  11. #10
    Member ADAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    1,680

    Re: Gw-9000 Vs Gw-9100

    I love the real titanium in front of case/bezel.The G-9100 is "plastic piece".

Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •