Let's talk about G-shock "icons"... what are they, why are they...

Thread: Let's talk about G-shock "icons"... what are they, why are they...

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Member duke4c's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    4,883

    Let's talk about G-shock "icons"... what are they, why are they...

    I started thinking about this recently and I'd like to share my thoughts here.

    What are the icons of G?

    When I think about it I can only think of following models:

    6900
    5600
    and
    Frog

    I can't really say that I know of any other "icon". When I say "icon" I think of a G that has for whatever reason managed to stand the test of time. It's not always obvious to understand why would a certain model witstand a test of time so well as above models. Neither is it always easy to figure out what make a certan model such an icon to begin with.

    6900 - bulky, no special features, not atomic, not solar... only 2 years battery life as advertized ... and yet it's in continous production longer than ANY other G out there... what gives?
    5600 - ok, this one might be easier to understand. After all it wears rather small and has all the features that you REALLY need.

    and Frog? What's so special about frog? When the Frog came out did anyone expect it to became an instant Icon? To a point where folks pay ridiculus amount of money to get one? What's with frog? I dare to say that 99% of the folks who have frog don't even dive. So what gives?

    What is your thought on this? What other models out there would you consider to have proven themselfs more than any other model ever released?

    I was thinking of adding 9052 and new mudman on the list but perhaps it's fair to say that a) 9052 has not beein in production that long plus we don't see it as beeing released all the time. How about new mudman? An icon? In the future perhaps, it's popularity is already stagering and it does not appear to slow down even after almost 2 years of it beeing actually released.

    So what are the other icons out there? And what made tham icons that they are today?

  2. #2
    Member Lexxorcist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    4,619

    Re: Let's talk about G-shock "icons"... what are they, why are they...

    Maybe it's because they were around for a long time before we had the variety of models and features we have now. The DW5600 is the most iconic one to me, not just of G-Shocks but Casio in general (as it resembles early non G-Shock Casios). It looks great, and it's well thought out.

    With me being quite new to G-Shocks, I already see the G9000 Mudman as a classic. Whether it'll be an enduring classic and ever have a similar status to the others you mentioned, only time will tell. I think it just might.
    "The future is something which everyone reaches at the rate of sixty minutes an hour, whatever he does, whoever he is." C S Lewis

  3. #3
    Member NickDolin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    West By God Virginia.
    Posts
    4,930

    Re: Let's talk about G-shock "icons"... what are they, why are they...

    I agree, it seems like the Mudman may be a classic as many on the forum own one or more of the models, even I'm considering getting one. Now if just the 1v version came in tough solar/waveceptor....

  4. Remove Advertisements
    WatchUSeek.com
    Advertisements
     

  5. #4
    Member tseely's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Boise, Idaho
    Posts
    472

    Re: Let's talk about G-shock "icons"... what are they, why are they...

    I think the Mudman has the potential to become a classic or "icon" but I don't think it's there yet. To me, a true icon has to have been around a little longer than 2-3 years. When someone sees my DW-5600e on they instantly know it's a Casio and many know it's a G-Shock but I don't think the Mudman has that same recognition quite yet.

    I'm sure it will become a classic at the rate it's going. I own a DW-5600e and a DW-6900 and I plan to get a Mudman soon and I think the basic black Mudman will fall into the same category as those two. Just my .02!
    Last edited by tseely; November 17th, 2007 at 23:33. Reason: change in wording
    It's always sunny in Boise!!

  6. #5
    Moderator G-Shock Forum Sjors's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    21,525

    Re: Let's talk about G-shock "icons"... what are they, why are they...

    I think the DW-5600E, DW-6600 and DW-6900 are the longest around and still produced models. I think those are the icons of G. The Frogman is more for the collectors and people who love big watches. The 5600, 6600 and 6900 are probably the most worn models. If the G-9000 Mudman is still produced in say 2016, I think it might be added to the Icon list as well.

    Cheers,

    Sjors
    There are only 10 kind of people. Those who understand binary and those who don't.


    Bezoek ook eens het Nederlandstalige WUS forum: Kaliber 2010


  7. #6
    Member David S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Kent, UK
    Posts
    1,677

    Re: Let's talk about G-shock "icons"... what are they, why are they...

    Personally, I think it's the simplicity of the design. There's a lot of newer models, the G-300 at the top of the page for instance, which have a lot of unnecessary, albeit attractive, design features. I like the watch, but I don't think it'll stand the test of time as well as some others.

    As Lexxorcist said of the 5600, 'It looks great, and it's well thought out.'. I couldn't agree more. I've heard someone talk about G's produced 'before the designers took over', and for me that sums it up. When the watch is designed around it's functions, rather than it's looks, it just works better somehow-like the Land Rover.

  8. #7
    Member casiophile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Alpharetta, GA, USA
    Posts
    1,558

    Re: Let's talk about G-shock "icons"... what are they, why are they...

    The iconic G-Shocks, to me, are the DW-5xxx models . Prior to 1990 the G-Shock wasn't a designers pallet, wasn't a limited edition bling watch, wasn't famous, wasn't Casio's flagship model, wasn't a 'brand' unto itself, wasn't really anything except a tough watch in the Casio line which sold to guys who needed a durable timepiece that could take whatever rough treatment they gave it.
    These early G's all have a purpose driven look and feel to them that sums up what the G-Shock was supposed to be all about in the first place: toughness. They're an excellent example of the well worn phrase, "Form follows function".

    Cheers, Greg

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •