MUDMAN (classic) vs RAYSMAN (solar)

Thread: MUDMAN (classic) vs RAYSMAN (solar)

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    302

    MUDMAN (classic) vs RAYSMAN (solar)

    I was wonder which one would you guys pick and why? I'm having a hard time with these two. I kind of like them both but for different reason. I like the fact that a Raysman can still fuction under extreme weather -20 degress. I like the Mudman because of the shape and the thoughness of it. In your opinition, If a person was to start collecting Casio G shock watches, which one is a better buy?.:-S

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    71

    Re: MUDMAN (classic) vs RAYSMAN (solar)

    Hi Mick, that a easy one, Raysman!!!! any day!! :gold.

    Start with any Rays and you will fall in deeply in Love.

  3. #3
    Banned OZZIE's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Was Japan, now back home in Cairns, Queensland, Australia
    Posts
    3,776

    Laughing Raysman

    Hi Mick -

    I would choose a RAYSMAN because since owning once since 1998, Iy have used/tried/tested and abused it and it still works as well as the day I got it.

    It has become my survival travel watch because I know I can rely on it.

    I'm sure the (classic) MUDMAN would perform just as well, although I cannot vouch for this as never really used one hard, or for a long time.

    If I had to bet, I would certainly say the MUDMAN would work.

    Taking all into account, the RAYSMAN is solar, and bigger, so It's got my choice.

    Hope this helps your possible choice and ENJOY the photos
    (No more MUDMAN photos as it's a touchy subject)


  4. Remove Advertisements
    WatchUSeek.com
    Advertisements
     

  5. #4
    G-Shock Mod stockae92's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Southern California - USA
    Posts
    13,512

    Re: MUDMAN (classic) vs RAYSMAN (solar)

    for me personally, i can only wear a raysman

    classic mudman is just too much for my wrist to handle

    plus raysman got all the features of mudman (except for the 3 eyes) + solar + metal bezel + tele-memo (which i don't use much at all)

  6. #5
    Member cmoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,237

    Re: Raysman

    You're yellow Raysman is awesome!

    Quote Originally Posted by OZZIE
    Hi Mick -

    I would choose a RAYSMAN because since owning once since 1998, Iy have used/tried/tested and abused it and it still works as well as the day I got it.

    It has become my survival travel watch because I know I can rely on it.

    I'm sure the (classic) MUDMAN would perform just as well, although I cannot vouch for this as never really used one hard, or for a long time.

    If I had to bet, I would certainly say the MUDMAN would work.

    Taking all into account, the RAYSMAN is solar, and bigger, so It's got my choice.

    Hope this helps your possible choice and ENJOY the photos
    (No more MUDMAN photos as it's a touchy subject)


  7. #6
    Member LuV2x3l3R8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    U.S.A
    Posts
    498

    Re: MUDMAN (classic) vs RAYSMAN (solar)

    hello Mick .. i would choose raysman over mudman any day of the week. i have worn raysman for 8 years wothout changing its battery and its still running very accurate.
    Attached Images Attached Images









    Last edited by LuV2x3l3R8; July 24th, 2006 at 18:39.

  8. #7
    Banned OZZIE's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Was Japan, now back home in Cairns, Queensland, Australia
    Posts
    3,776

    Re: Raysman

    Quote Originally Posted by cmoy
    You're yellow Raysman is awesome!
    Thanks Chris

  9. #8
    Member cmoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,237

    Re: Raysman

    No, thank you for posting it

    Quote Originally Posted by OZZIE
    Thanks Chris

  10. #9
    Banned OZZIE's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Was Japan, now back home in Cairns, Queensland, Australia
    Posts
    3,776

    Re: MUDMAN (classic) vs RAYSMAN (solar)

    B-)

  11. #10
    Member brad15470's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Pa, USA
    Posts
    1,477

    Re: MUDMAN (classic) vs RAYSMAN (solar)

    Ten minutes ago I would have said Mudman; but I just received the Raysman/9300MS-8T in the mail; I would choose the Raysman





    BradB-)B-)B-)
    Brad
    Have a great day.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

    Similar Threads

    1. Replies: 9
      Last Post: July 20th, 2006, 02:27
    2. Replies: 10
      Last Post: July 16th, 2006, 19:38
    3. New MUDMAN solar?
      By OZZIE in forum Casio G-Shock
      Replies: 21
      Last Post: May 18th, 2006, 17:05
    4. Replies: 0
      Last Post: May 5th, 2005, 12:13
    5. DW-8400 MUDMAN users review by Hung Lo
      By Sjors in forum Reviews
      Replies: 0
      Last Post: May 5th, 2005, 12:01

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •