Negative display comparison: DW6900 vs G9000

Thread: Negative display comparison: DW6900 vs G9000

Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Milan, Italy
    Posts
    7

    Negative display comparison: DW6900 vs G9000

    Hello everybody. Does anyone had the chance to do a live comparison of the negative displays on DW6900MS and G9000-3VER? I have the 6900MS, the watch is a beauty but I must admit the display isn't that readible especially under soft ligth. Looking at the G9000-3VER, which I like a lot, the negative display looks much "brighter" and the numbers seem white instead of red as on the 6900. Anyone owns both and can can share his opinion?

    Cheers.

    Ale
    Attached Images Attached Images




  2. #2
    Member MRG-1000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,057

    Re: Negative display comparison: DW6900 vs G9000

    Quote Originally Posted by Ale73 View Post
    Hello everybody. Does anyone had the chance to do a live comparison of the negative displays on DW6900MS and G9000-3VER? I have the 6900MS, the watch is a beauty but I must admit the display isn't that readible especially under soft ligth. Looking at the G9000-3VER, which I like a lot, the negative display looks much "brighter" and the numbers seem white instead of red as on the 6900. Anyone owns both and can can share his opinion?
    The MS-series models have a reddish LCD which results in lower contrast of the inverse display. It is definitely better on the Mudman, but still somewhat limited in poor ambient light.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •