Is there something wrong with the PRG-270?
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Odie

Thread: Is there something wrong with the PRG-270?

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Member captain kid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Groningen NL
    Posts
    1,144

    Question Is there something wrong with the PRG-270?

    I don't know much about Protreks but I just discovered the PRG-270 and to my surprise a forum search showed almost no hits.

    It has the new v3 sensors, it is nice and thin, it looks like a cross between the older Protreks and the new sleek PRW-3000 and it has lots of features.
    The only thing really missing is atomic but that also means if you shop around you could get it for $150! Which seems like a bargain for a Casio with compass, solar, barometer (altimeter) and thermometer. I mean even older Protreks cost at least that.
    As an added bonus it is available in lots of different colours.

    Name:  PRG-270-1AJF.jpg
Views: 4115
Size:  95.9 KB
    stolen pic

    Sooo. what's going on, everybody to busy with the Rangeman?

    Bonus question: I thought in the US Protrek was called Pathfinder but no more?

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    471

    Re: Is there something wrong with the PRG-270?

    I had a choice between the PRG-270 and the PRW-3000 not too long ago, and I chose the latter for the following reasons:

    1. Slimmer profile
    2. Atomic (doesn't matter where I live but still..)
    3. I don't like the 270's sensor jutting out to the left
    4. I liked the ABC buttons of the 3000 better
    5. Slightly smaller screen area (at least from the pics it appears so) of the PRG-270
    6. Black buckle on the -ve display PRW-3000 as opposed to the shiny buckle of the -ve display PRG-270

    The retail price difference between the two models is around $50 in India and at the time there was a 20% sale going on that further narrowed this down to $40 so I took the plunge.

  3. #3
    Member CanonMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    2,097

    Re: Is there something wrong with the PRG-270?

    No I prefer it. Looks more like a Protrek than the 3000.



    Sent from my GT-N7000 using Xparent Red Tapatalk 2
    The 7900's are my favourites, although the 56s are currently my focus. But nothing is excluded, except pink Risemans.

  4. Remove Advertisements
    WatchUSeek.com
    Advertisements
     

  5. #4
    lvt
    lvt is offline
    Member lvt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    The dark side of the Moon
    Posts
    16,809

    Re: Is there something wrong with the PRG-270?

    It looks fine to me, maybe it's not always available locally.
    Ball - Casio (G-shock) - HMT - Longines - Parnis - Seagull - Steinhart - Tissot - Victorinox - Yema

  6. #5
    Member Odie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    1,401

    Re: Is there something wrong with the PRG-270?

    I now have a Ranger, but I have had both the 3000 and the 270. The 270 has a better build quality to it than the 240. The one thing that they changed with the 270 is the strap. They didn't use the "bar" system that most of the Protreks use now. The 270 has springbars.

    Yes, it used to be called Pathfinder at one time. Rumor has it that an agreement was made with Trek bicycle's to use the name Protrek here in the states. That's just what I've heard, whether there is any substance to that, I don't know.
    alexs12 likes this.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •