Bell & Ross BR03-92 Steel VS U-Boat Classico As 5570
Like Tree3Likes

Thread: Bell & Ross BR03-92 Steel VS U-Boat Classico As 5570

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
  1. #1
    wtf
    wtf is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    26

    Bell & Ross BR03-92 Steel VS U-Boat Classico As 5570

    my wife approved a 2,500 dollars budget for me new watch.
    i have decided to look for something unique, something really different.

    the selection:
    Bell & Ross BR0392-BL-ST
    Name:  IMG00044-20081222-2023.jpg
Views: 5804
Size:  47.6 KB

    Name:  13098_MAIN_2468.jpg
Views: 3901
Size:  128.7 KB

    Case: 42mm Steel
    Movement: ETA2892-A2
    WR: 100m


    U-Boat Classico As 5570

    Name:  u-boat-mens-5564-classico-watch-image-003.jpg
Views: 2608
Size:  7.7 KB
    Name:  U-Boat-Classico-AS-Black-Dial-Automatic-Brown-Leather-Mens-Watch-5564-0.jpg
Views: 3585
Size:  106.8 KB

    Case: 45mm Steel
    Movement: ETA2824-2
    WR:100m


    this maybe the 1st time anybody is doing a poll for 2 really "different" watches.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    San Jose, California-USA
    Posts
    37,130

    Re: Bell & Ross BR03-92 Steel VS U-Boat Classico As 5570

    Your gonna need a little more for the Bell & Ross.

  3. #3
    Member rics21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Bangkok
    Posts
    976

    Re: Bell & Ross BR03-92 Steel VS U-Boat Classico As 5570

    well done with the wrist shots.
    guess u did an amazing in depth research on your next purchase.

    i may not like the bell & ross "square" watches. but if i m to be given the choice u mentioned.
    i will get the Br03. there is no way i will buy an U-Boat.

    anyway, both jeremy clarkson and Stallone (the panerai guy) have jumped onto the U-Boat bangwagon.
    Name:  jc.jpg
Views: 30178
Size:  151.2 KBName:  slyuboat.jpg
Views: 6290
Size:  17.4 KB
    Last edited by rics21; January 2nd, 2013 at 09:50.
    I like my money right where I can see it: strapped to my wrist.

  4. Remove Advertisements
    WatchUSeek.com
    Advertisements
     

  5. #4
    Member rics21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Bangkok
    Posts
    976

    Re: Bell & Ross BR03-92 Steel VS U-Boat Classico As 5570

    Quote Originally Posted by Watchbreath View Post
    Your gonna need a little more for the Bell & Ross.
    more wrist or more dough?

    seems like jomashop is doing a sale on B&R.
    wtf likes this.
    I like my money right where I can see it: strapped to my wrist.

  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,194

    Re: Bell & Ross BR03-92 Steel VS U-Boat Classico As 5570

    Bell & Ross by a long way
    Cheers
    Where no counsel is the people fall, but in the multitude of counsellors there is safety.

    Instagram: @tophstewart

    References
    All liinked in one thread
    https://forums.watchuseek.com/f63/my...rs-903425.html

  7. #6
    Moderator Public Forum GlennO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    10,280

    Re: Bell & Ross BR03-92 Steel VS U-Boat Classico As 5570

    Neither of those suit my tastes, but the B&R is streets ahead IMO.
    The U Boat reminds me too much of those Russian divers produced by some other company.

  8. #7
    Member geoffbot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Brighton, UK
    Posts
    17,054

    Re: Bell & Ross BR03-92 Steel VS U-Boat Classico As 5570

    Quote Originally Posted by GlennO View Post
    Neither of those suit my tastes, but the B&R is streets ahead IMO.
    The U Boat reminds me too much of those Russian divers produced by some other company.
    This.

    Or you could save yourself a few quid and get something similar like a Dievas

    Name:  uploadfromtaptalk1357129236241.jpg
Views: 2578
Size:  43.1 KB
    Luskar and eliz like this.

  9. #8
    Member eliz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Singapore.
    Posts
    2,138

    Re: Bell & Ross BR03-92 Steel VS U-Boat Classico As 5570

    $2,500 on any of these 2 are a TOTAL waste. (IMO)
    If you're looking for something different at this price, check out Sinn and Damasko.
    ROLEX Datejust 36mm Blueberry;
    ROLEX Pepsi GMT-Master 16700 (Circa 1987);
    ZENITH El Primero 36'000 VPH Tri-Color;
    SEIKO Prospex Solar Tuna SBDN026 (1981/3000)

    Considerations:
    AUDEMARS PIGUET Royal Oak 15450
    A.LANGE & SOHNE Saxonia Thin 37mm

    Instagram: Horodiziac

  10. #9
    Member Cybotron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    5,265

    Re: Bell & Ross BR03-92 Steel VS U-Boat Classico As 5570

    No contest Bell & Ross. U-Boat is lost at sea.
    Regards,

    Richard




  11. #10
    wtf
    wtf is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    26

    Re: Bell & Ross BR03-92 Steel VS U-Boat Classico As 5570

    both sinn and damasko are dull looking.
    i m somehow looking for some excitement.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •