Can't decide... please help...

Thread: Can't decide... please help...

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    6

    Can't decide... please help...

    Hi All,

    I am looking to get a watch that I can wear to the office. We go smart casual, with occasional suits and ties when we have visitors. I would like to get something with a moonphase and something in gold; however, I do not have the funds for a real gold watch. I have narrowed my search to the following and would like to hear your opinions on these two:

    1. Frederique Constant (rose gold plated stainless steel case)

    Name:  FC008-3.jpg
Views: 218
Size:  137.4 KB

    2. Maurice Lacroix

    Name:  ML_2.jpg
Views: 196
Size:  235.7 KB



    As I have never had a gold watch, I am leaning towards the FC; however, I am very concerned about the quality of the gold plating and how it will stand against the test of time. Does anyone know how good the FC gold plating process is? Is it a simple one layer gold plating or do they use multiple layers? How quickly or easily will the gold plating wear out? There is nothing on the FC website on their gold plating process.

    Thanks in advance for your help and comments.

    (NOTE: My apologies for using pictures from the web, rather than my own)

  2. #2
    Member rfortson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    10,398

    Re: Can't decide... please help...

    I love that FC and have wanted one. However, I'm not sure I'd get the rose gold as I don't have/can't find rose gold buckles for my belt. Yes, my fashion sense drives me to that, though I guess (given the lack of RG accessories) I must be one of the few that worries about it. Personally, I like to match leathers and metals. For that reason, I'd suggest the SS version of the FC.

    The ML is also nice looking but to me the fact that the FC is an in-house design makes it more interesting (unique) to me. I'm not saying it's better, just that it's a little more unique. Realize, that may be a problem when it comes time for service, though. Your servicing options may be a little more limited and expensive.

  3. #3
    Member little big feather's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    U.S.A.
    Posts
    10,871

    Re: Can't decide... please help...

    Both are great...I can find no fault with either, except the gold plating issue.
    Any watches posted may be seen as gifts,borrowed or found property and not as personal property of Little Big Feather.

  4. Remove Advertisements
    WatchUSeek.com
    Advertisements
     

  5. #4
    Member OrangeSport's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Essex, UK
    Posts
    3,107

    Re: Can't decide... please help...

    I much prefer the look of the FC, but gold plating for a daily wearer would worry me...
    --------------------------------------------------
    Rolex Oyster Perpetual 116000
    1965 Accurist Shockmaster
    1961 Gold Accurist Shockmaster
    Seiko SSC021P1
    Omega Speedmaster Professional 3570.50.00

    Meistersinger Perigraph AM1002
    G-Shock GW3000B-1A

    Rolex Submariner 14060M
    Ben Sherman S489.OOBS
    1990 Rotary Gold Case
    --------------------------------------------------

    --------------------------------------------------


  6. #5
    Member sticky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    South Yorkshire
    Posts
    54,036

    Re: Can't decide... please help...

    I prefer the FC by a mile but regardless of how the plating might wear I wondered if it was a little "dressy" for casual occasions?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •