I have an IWC Aquatimer 2000Ti as one of my main 2 daily-wear watches ( the other is an MBII ) and I really like it. It wears light, and with its internal bezel it is relatively easy to wear under the cuff of shirtsleeves when necessary. The bracelet is perhaps the best ever. And of course it has a touch of pedigree.
Recently I've been wanting to add an Omega Seamaster GMT to the mix. I like it because it has decent WR, it's a good size for me and my thin 6.7" wrist, and it has a relatively low profile bezel. It's also a GMT, which would fill a gap in my small collection. Prices are decent and money is not an issue.
I am on the fence because I am wondering if the 2 watches are similar enough that one would displace the other in the regular rotation. Granted, I *have* an AT2000Ti now, and I do like it a lot. I am also an IWC fan of sorts. But I wonder... if I didn't have the IWC already, and if I were eyeballing both watches with the intention of getting only one of them, which one would I get? Which would you go for? Why?
Here's a pic of the Aquatimer:
I don't have any pics of the Omega, but take a look here:
OMEGA Watches: Seamaster 300 M GMT - Steel on steel - 2234.50.00