ROLEX Submariner No Date vs. PANERAI 441 Ceramic
Like Tree32Likes

Thread: ROLEX Submariner No Date vs. PANERAI 441 Ceramic

Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 65
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    10

    ROLEX Submariner No Date vs. PANERAI 441 Ceramic

    Hi everyone!


    I am about to buy a watch but can´t decide between Rolex Sub no date and Panerai 441 Ceramic.
    Rolex is 40mm case size vs 44mm Panerai.
    Both are beautiful watches. What do you think?
    All comments and suggestions are welcome! Thanks!

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    3,470

    Re: ROLEX Submariner No Date vs. PANERAI 441 Ceramic

    They're completely different watches. Why not the PAM 441 vs Rolex GMT Master II? Otherwise get them both.

  3. #3
    Member Ridly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Westchester, NY
    Posts
    276

    ROLEX Submariner No Date vs. PANERAI 441 Ceramic

    Totally different watches. You are most likely going to end up selling the PAM if you get it. I don't know one person who kept their PAM for over two years.
    Nishant likes this.

  4. Remove Advertisements
    WatchUSeek.com
    Advertisements
     

  5. #4
    Member wuyeah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    USA + Taiwan + China
    Posts
    7,472

    Re: ROLEX Submariner No Date vs. PANERAI 441 Ceramic

    There is no comparison. Submariner no date.
    BusyTimmy likes this.

  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    372

    Re: ROLEX Submariner No Date vs. PANERAI 441 Ceramic

    Don't know how you even place them in the same post. Sub, no question.
    BusyTimmy likes this.

  7. #6
    Member Dienekes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    1,845

    ROLEX Submariner No Date vs. PANERAI 441 Ceramic

    Just about everyone here will tell you to get the Sub. Nice watch but kind of a yawner... You will then see the Sub on every other big shot's wrist. Be original and get the Panny!
    p_477 likes this.

  8. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    3,470

    Re: ROLEX Submariner No Date vs. PANERAI 441 Ceramic

    I don't much about that PAM save it appears the second hour hand is slaved to the prime hour hand and is a 12-hour counter. If that's the case it wouldn't be very useful to me. A true GMT needs to have an independently adjustable 24-hour hand.

  9. #8
    Member omega1234's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    3,514

    Re: ROLEX Submariner No Date vs. PANERAI 441 Ceramic

    Sub, no question.
    BusyTimmy likes this.
    Collection:
    Vacheron Constantin Overseas
    JLC Deep Sea Chrono
    Breguet Marine Grande Date
    Tudor Black Bay Black
    Omega Speedmaster 3570.50


  10. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    San Jose, California-USA
    Posts
    37,119

    Re: ROLEX Submariner No Date vs. PANERAI 441 Ceramic

    The Sub is boring, the Panerai.
    p_477 likes this.

  11. #10
    Member Perseus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    13,545

    Re: ROLEX Submariner No Date vs. PANERAI 441 Ceramic

    I'd be surprised if the Rolex doesn't win by a landslide. I like the Pam but I'm not sure they worth the asking price.


Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •