What do you think is comparable to the Explorer 214270?

[EKWEB]

Hey folks....

I want to get some thoughts on what you think pound for pound, dollar for dollar is comparable or superior to the Rolex Explorer 214270...

Just a few reminders about the Explorer to get the comparisons as tight as possible:

• Manufacture movement
• SS band
• Water resistant to 100M
• 39mm
• Retail From AD $6,550.00
• Simple Design
• Black dial
• Durable

I've sort of settled (with my own limited knowledge) on the Explorer I as a sort of "best fit" for me for a day in day out wearer, but am concerned that the brand is SO WELL known that there may be another watch with similar traits that I just don't know of yet.

I'm excited to see what the forum comes up with and appreciate the help greatly!

[hotmustardsauce]

[EKWEB]

Does that Omega have an in house movement? Thanks for idea!

[hotmustardsauce]

Yes it does.

If you buy Rolex, you have to want the brand recognition/history that comes with it. Otherwise there are far superior options out there for the money (Omega/Grand Seiko).

[EKWEB]

Yes it does.

If you buy Rolex, you have to want the brand recognition/history that comes with it. Otherwise there are far superior options out there for the money (Omega/Grand Seiko).

I honestly say this from a place of ignorance...

What superior option are there, More features? better build quality?

[omega1234]

I honestly say this from a place of ignorance...

What superior option are there, More features? better build quality?

The build quality of Grand Seiko, in particular, is superior to that of Rolex, but I much prefer the designs that Rolex is putting out. I especially love the Explorer, its my favorite Rolex, but may I suggest looking at the more traditional and understated 114270. I'm a big fan of Rolex and to learn how other Rolex fan boys feel about GS, go on TRF and look at a long thread there in which the consensus is that GS has better build quality.

[drhr]

Sold my Rolex Explorers (had both 36 mm and 39 mm models) and kept this, 39 mm with a date. Just liked the overall quality better (personal opinion). Just as accurate. And it was less expensive, which did not hurt . . .

[MWR1973]

How is this thread different than your one watch to rule them all thread?

[Ephraim Gerstein]

I have both an Explorer and a GS. Like them both a lot. I find them to be similar build quality for the price, which for the models I own is comparable.

However, the Explorer is a classic, and has subtle design characteristics that you will not find on any other timepiece. I consider it my "daily wearer" and it looks great with everything from jeans and a t-shirt to three-piece suit.

My GS is a spring drive so even more accurate. Like the Explorer, it is beautifully designed and masterfully crafted. But it is a different watch. Wearing it is a totally different experience.

I don't think you can go wrong with either, but, if possible, I'd recommend trying both to see which you like better.



Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

[EKWEB]

How is this thread different than your one watch to rule them all thread?

Well when I started one watch to rule... I was not settled on any thing really, knew of Explorer of course, but was thinking more Planet Ocean or Datejust...

Since then (last week) a lot of comments came in on the Explorer I of being a great fit to my parameters and I have kind of settled in my mind on it for 1st place.
I guess i want to see if there are any watches out there similar to the Explorer's Parameters that may be a better choice... Sorry if it bores...