I made a huge mistake of trying on that yachtmaster and now I definitely want it.
And while the yachtmaster is a much more expensive watch and won’t hold value as well, it definitely looks a lot sharper. Plus I think the oyster flex would fit my wrists better. I have these weird small wrists and the glide lock doesn’t centre on my wrists.
cons are the oyster flex might not be as durable, nor the rose gold case. And it won’t hold the value as well.
Although I have no issues owning more than one Rolex, I would prefer them to be entirely different designs and not the same sport watch with ceramic bezel type design if I did own more than one Rolex.
What a tough decision. I feel your pain. Personally I think you should go for the Yachtmaster, and I think the oysterflex is going to be quite durable, which might help make the decision easier. It will definitely fit you well, as they size it by cutting it. I tried on the new Yacht 42 at my AD a few weeks ago, and it felt incredible. I totally understand the desire to buy it!
You could always sell the Sub, but I think they are different enough in style that (funds permitting) it might not be crazy to have both. Plus the Sub is so liquid, you can always sell it later if you change your mind and want to get some quick cash. I've never had any problem selling any sport watch when I made the decision to let one go (I struggle wayyyyy more with the decision to sell one, than I ever did finding a buyer).
I voted YM RG. You should be able to get some kind of discount for precious metal, even if it's special order.
Go for it! IMHO the Sub C is not that discrete. The ceramic and deeper teeth in the bezel make the Sub C stand out much more like jewelry than actual tool watch. Esp if wearer's wrist is 7" or below. The previous aluminum series are slightly more inconspicuous then of course all vintages are even more discrete.
So, why not just go for what you really want, and get a vintage explorer, op, or air king if you're feeling discrete.
If it was me or my money, I would definitely do it. Right now the steel Subs are riding the wave of artificial scarcity... so might as well take advantage of it. Alternatively you can sell only the head of the 114060 along with box and papers. Just retain the Sub bracelet. That bracelet would be hugely helpful in the long run. Of course you will get a little less money.
I am highly biased towards the RG YM. I am assuming you are talking about the newer generation 126655. At this moment it is high on my list but I want to associate that watch with a certain substantial growth in my career. For wrists on the smaller side, the YM wears awesome. There is something about the weight of gold coupled with the comfort of the Oysterflex strap and the micro-adjustable clasp.
I would recommend buying that watch. Don’t worry about the lost value.
I made a huge mistake of trying on that yachtmaster and now I definitely want it.
::
the yachtmaster is a much more expensive watch it definitely looks a lot sharper.
::
cons are the oyster flex might not be as durable, nor the rose gold case.
::
yay or nay?
Another go for it as once you’re in that mind set the outcome is usually inevitable. Strap replacement is low cost maintenance according to Dogbert, which is good to know.
Of course yay! You love the watch, you obviously can afford it, and value retention is not a factor when you go into PM territory, so, I tell you: go for it!
I voted nay. However, I am not in your shoes and don't have the same affinity as you for the 18K RG YM. Hence I feel you should come to your own decision without assistance from any of us, which assistance comes with each of our own bias.
I voted nay. However, I am not in your shoes and don't have the same affinity as you for the 18K RG YM. Hence I feel you should come to your own decision without assistance from any of us, which assistance comes with each of our own bias.
I voted, "Nay", because I think you should have both. As has been said, you can always sell the Sub later if you choose. Having both watches gives you time to compare them. Enjoy the process!
Heck yes!!! If you love the YM and can swing it ... get your dream watch. I agree that if you had to sell your 114060 - now you will receive top dollar for it.
I would never lose my Sub but I get it. I just saw a WG YM yesterday while visiting my AD (not for sale) a friend of the owner and it was stunning. That dial and bezel are beautiful and the OF just worked. I'd put that in grail territory.
I've always liked the 40mm RG YM. With the rising tide of the SS sports watches, the RG YM40 has actually gone up in value over the last few years (but probably not by as much as the 114060).
Buy what you like. If you prefer the RG YM40 over the SubC, then go for it! I think the RG YM40 is a beautiful watch, with the matte bezel and the red writing on the dial. Very classy with the RG case and clasp too.
I don't think there's any risk of any degradation of the Oysterflex bracelet either. Rolex builds things to last.
Come on man, it's Rolex, that band has more than just rubber in it. It also has titanium in it as well so it will be durable. Also, if by some chance it didn't hold up, here in the states it costs about $330 per half to replace. My 116655 is my weekend tool watch for all water activities and it holds up just fine. It's my Rolex that gets banged around the most and I don't see any nicks or scratches on it. The value part is only a factor if you know you're going to sell it, because BNIB they always seem to be sold for less second hand, unlike the SubC. Also, IMHO that SubC looks too big on your wrist. If you want more than 1 Rolex, I say make your second one a classic 36mm DJ based on your wrist size. Good luck on your decision.
I'd say go for it, you only love once. I took the plunge a few months ago and love mine. I have small wrists too and was considering the 37mm model, but when I tried it on it felt tiny on the wrist...the 40mm version is definitely the one to go for.
Contrary to what others have said I don't think it's that flashy, the rubber bracelet and Matt black ceramic bezel tone the watch down quite a fair bit. Also, the rubber strap isn't cut to size as another member stated...you buy the strap size combination based on your wrist size. I've got the older model without the sub style adjustable clasp...don't miss it though as mine fits perfectly and is very comfortable. I wear it mostly on weekends and it takes the abuse as well as a normal sub.
I finally gave in and sold my Sub. I could not stand the fat lugs, despite a year of trying to convince myself that it was ok. If you aren't in love with your Sub, then sell it now for the premium and then buy the Yachtmaster at a nice discount.
There will always be Subs and I assure you that the next generation Rolex releases will be an improvement.
Well, I can get a deal of sorts on it new so I wouldn't lose money if I did decide to flip it. The plan however is to keep it forever but that was also the plan for the sub and that appears to be on the chopping block now.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
WatchUSeek Watch Forums
22.5M posts
575.5K members
Since 2005
A forum community dedicated to watch owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about watch collections, displays, watch winders, accessories, classifieds, and more! We welcome all manufacturers including Casio G-Shock, OMEGA, Rolex, Breitling, Rolex and Tudor, Seiko, Grand Seiko and others.