Stowa Flieger impressions and review vs Archimede 42H and Alpina Startimer Pilot
Like Tree6Likes

Thread: Stowa Flieger impressions and review vs Archimede 42H and Alpina Startimer Pilot

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    26

    Stowa Flieger impressions and review vs Archimede 42H and Alpina Startimer Pilot

    Got my Flieger a few weeks ago and wanted to share my impressions. Also, I previously ordered and returned Archimede 42H and Alpina Startimer Pilot, so I wanted to share my take on all three as the questions and comparisons often come up as to which to buy.


    I wanted to buy a pilot watch for a while, but I really didn’t want to spend over 1k on a pilot style watch, no matter how much I liked IWCs and Zenith's versions of it. I don’t care about the heritage much, since none of these watches really resemble the original pilot watches, and companies making them are entirely different companies than they used to be. I simply wanted a nice looking quality semi-beater in pilot style.


    I initially wanted to get the Stowa, but the price together with the long wait, as well as it being on the smaller side put me off, so I ordered an Alpina Startimer 44mm. I ended up returning it and ordering an Archimede 42H thinking that it would be good enough since it’s very similar to Stowa. It was also in stock and cost a few hundred less, so it made a lot of sense. Ultimately, I returned it as well and waited 3 months for the Stowa. I am happy with my purchase, but there are definitely things Stowa can improve upon. Not commenting on the movement as I believe all 3 use variations of the same 2824-2.


    Alpina Startimer Pilot 44mm


    Probably the best overall finish of the three, as well as feature set (strap quality, clasp, box, screw down, etc). Also had the best dial - sharp, nice finish, antiglare coating. If you look around, you can find it for about the same price as Stowa, or a little bit more. The issue I had with this watch is that it tuned out to be much bigger than I anticipated. I have a big wrist (7”) but the watch just felt huge and stiff. The crown was way too big and sharp around the edges. It cut into my wrist. I think a comparable Stowa (with alligator strap and deployment clasp) would actually cost more than the Alpina. Had this watch fit better, I would probably keep it. The Aplina also had the best packaging/presentation as it came in a really nice case and with a really cool looking model plane.


    Archimede 42H


    Good watch. Even though it was 2mm smaller than Startimer, it also felt too big for its size and the crown was huge and sharp as with the Alpina. The diamond crown looks great until you put the watch on, then it just gets in the way and cuts into your wrist. I understand now that a pilot watch over 40mm should probably be a chrono as the plain matte black dial just doesn’t look right with all that empty space. The 42H was well finished, slightly worse than Stowa. I didn’t like that all the indicators had a yellowish tint to them (probably due to C3), which made the watch look a bit dull. Also, without logo and date, the watch looked like it was missing something. Overall, it’s similar to Stowa, but definitely feels a cheaper watch. It came in a very plain and generic black box - not a big deal, but presentation definitely matters. Great customer service, the watch shipped quickly and the return was easy (they even refunded original shipping fee)


    Stowa Flieger with date & logo


    Definitely the best overall watch out of the three. Wish the wait was shorter, but it was probably worth it. The size is perfect for a flieger, and the onion crown looks and feels fantastic. The finish is great, better than Archimede and close to Alpina. I got the TOP movement version, so the watch has been very accurate thus far and wears nicely due to its size and shape. It’s 40mm, but wears a big larger due to the lugs. Has the best lume out of the three. Customer service was great as well. Came in a really nice metal case with personalized paperwork, so it made a good impression right away. Few things that I feel could be improved, especially at this price:



    • The rotor seems a bit loose by design, so it makes more noise than it has to as you move around. Not super loud, but you can hear the clicking in a quiet environment. Compared it to my co-workers 6 year old Stowa Flieger and it was the same. Doesn’t seem to impact the operation of the watch though, more of an annoyance.
    • Would be great if the crown was a screw in type. I think that should be a given at this price point. Alpina had a screw in crown and 2x the rated water resistance at 10ATM. I would not feel comfortable wetting the Stowa.


    • I wanted the date feature since it’s an additional (and useful) complication and the plain dial would look better with it. I think the placement could be improved though. I like how Sinn has it between 4 & 5, it's there but very much out of the way. Having the date window replace the 6 makes it more noticeable than it has to be. I still think it looks better than no date version though. Having the date window there makes the watch look a bit less round, which is a good thing.
    • Dial could be a bit sharper and numbers/indicators would look better without the slightly yellowish tint (could be unavoidable due to C3). The second indicators are white but they don’t glow. Definitely better looking dial than 42H, but could be improved. Antiglare would be nice.



    Hope this rant helps somebody make a decision one way or the other. Sorry for the rambling, here are some phone pics ..

    Name:  photo 1.JPG
Views: 8511
Size:  276.7 KB

    Name:  photo 2.JPG
Views: 8436
Size:  242.7 KB

  2. #2
    Member sduford's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Playa Blanca, Panama
    Posts
    2,537

    Re: Stowa Flieger impressions and review vs Archimede 42H and Alpina Startimer Pilot

    Just curious as to why you ordered an Archimede 42H and not the regular 42 if you don't like the sterile dial and vintage lume? That's the whole point of the H variant...
    Last edited by sduford; March 21st, 2014 at 07:47.
    Archimede Pilot 42H, Chr.Ward C60 Trident Pro, Dan Henry 1964 GT, Hamilton Intra-Matic, Melbourne Flinders & Portsea, Orient Bambino, PerpetuaL R-01, Seiko's SRPC93 & SNE498, Szanto 1204, Traser H3 Classic Master, Vostok Amphibia, WUS F72 GMT.

    Web: Crown & Rotor, IG: @crownandrotor FB: @crownandrotor

  3. #3
    Member mpalmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Middle of the Middle West
    Posts
    27,917

    Re: Stowa Flieger impressions and review vs Archimede 42H and Alpina Startimer Pilot

    Welcome to the forum!
    "The stuff that dreams are made of…" - RGM ‘801 EE Motor Barrel’

  4. Remove Advertisements
    WatchUSeek.com
    Advertisements
     

  5. #4
    Member hidden830726's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    1,995

    Re: Stowa Flieger impressions and review vs Archimede 42H and Alpina Startimer Pilot

    Thanks for the review.

    Wonder you mentioned, The Alpina is the best overall finish of the three. How is the Alpina finish compare to Stowa? Can u share more about this? Thanks

  6. #5
    Ita
    Ita is offline
    Member Ita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    2,006

    Re: Stowa Flieger impressions and review vs Archimede 42H and Alpina Startimer Pilot

    I love your watch Olegr...

    Flieger with date, sweep seconds and logo is my favourite.

    Ita
    Well, it's so good to be here,
    asleep on your lawn.
    Remember your guard dog?
    Well, I'm afraid that he's gone.

  7. #6
    Member CM HUNTER's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    WNC Mountains
    Posts
    5,198

    Re: Stowa Flieger impressions and review vs Archimede 42H and Alpina Startimer Pilot

    Quote Originally Posted by sduford View Post
    Just curious as to why you ordered an Archimede 42H and not the regular 42 if you don't like the sterile dial and vintage lume? That's the whole point of the H variant...
    +1 Plus stating the preference for the date being between 4 and 5 is exactly where Archimede puts it on the standard version.

  8. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    47

    Re: Stowa Flieger impressions and review vs Archimede 42H and Alpina Startimer Pilot

    Hi olegr,

    What about the Alpina 40mm, why haven't you tried that one?

  9. #8
    Member elbilo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    New England, USA
    Posts
    969

    Re: Stowa Flieger impressions and review vs Archimede 42H and Alpina Startimer Pilot

    Congrats on the STOWA! I also wish the STOWA had a screw-in crown, but I understand it's not meant to get wet. Personally, I think having the date at 6:00 offers better flow. I think the date at 4:30 would make the dial look a little cluttered, so for me, it would be distracting and stand out more than it does at 6:00. To each his own.
    Last edited by elbilo; March 21st, 2014 at 16:35.
    closeup likes this.
    ~ Eric

  10. #9
    CSG
    CSG is offline
    Member CSG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    1,184

    Re: Stowa Flieger impressions and review vs Archimede 42H and Alpina Startimer Pilot

    I'd placed an order for a Stowa Flieger plain dial, no date but cancelled it when I came across the Archimedes 39H. A few hundred cheaper, same movement, in house case, and slightly smaller (which is better for my wrist size). But if one wants a date feature, I far prefer where Stowa puts theirs vs. Archimede's placement between 4 and 5.

  11. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    127

    Stowa Flieger impressions and review vs Archimede 42H and Alpina Startimer Pilot

    Nice comparison. I also did a lot of research, before deciding on a more modern looking German flieger. I do own 3 different Laco fliegers, 2 A dials and one B dial. My criteria was case size, quality, sterile dial, no date and handwinding, since most of my other Mil/Pil pieces are autos. I did not check out Alpina, but did research Archimede, and strongly considered it. The tipping point, though, was that Stowa has history behind it, and I have always heard good things about their quality and CS. This is what I wound up with (pun intended):



    I was able to get Stowa to substitute a 2801, for the 2824. The end result is beautiful, IMO. It is the perfect size, for me, the dial doesn't look too empty, given the 40 mm diameter. The lume color doesn't bother me. Mine looks white, until it fluoresces, and it is very bright, when it does. I especially like the low profile, and I opted for the historic engraving on the case side. Also, I LOVE the onion crown! I don't think I could have made a better choice. I ordered my watch last August, and received it in November. I have since heard that Stowa will no longer substitute the 2801, upon request. Perhaps they are finally running low on ETA movements. My watch also has the top grade movement, as I believe Stowa uses top grade, by default, or maybe that's Laco.

    The beautifully decorated 2801:

    Last edited by kellencl; March 21st, 2014 at 20:06.
    sduford likes this.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •