Pulse/Ox?
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By rationaltime

Thread: Pulse/Ox?

Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    100

    Pulse/Ox?

    Will the Series 4, or any Series for that matter, measure the blood oxygen levels? I had read that the circuitry is there, but can't find any info on it's current availability. Any ideas about this?

  2. #2
    Moderator German Watches Forum
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    6,007

    Apple watch Pulse Oximeter function?

    Quote Originally Posted by morsegist View Post
    Will the Series 4, or any Series for that matter, measure the blood oxygen levels? I had read that the circuitry is there, but can't find any info on it's current availability. Any ideas about this?
    I have no inside Apple information, but I do have some thoughts
    on the topic. First, for those not familiar let's have a little
    explanation.

    How could this work? If you look at fresh oxygenated blood
    you see a bright red color. The red color is strongly reflected.
    Blood without so much oxygen does not appear as bright, though
    still red enough to get your attention. In the infrared the blood
    carrying oxygen absorbs more light than the non. The different
    absorbing rates at the different colors can be used to calculate
    and look up the fraction of blood carrying oxygen. To put a
    number on it, for red light the non-oxygen carrying blood absorbs
    about 10 times more light than the oxygenated blood. I think
    of it like this. When blood comes out of the lungs it is bright.

    For about $20 you can buy a small device, an oximeter, that
    clips on the end of a finger and makes this measurement.
    The blood pressure in a finger tip gets a little boost every time the
    heart beats and for a moment gets a little peak in the amount of
    blood there. That absorbs a little more light, and the sensor can
    see the difference. The typical oximeter also reports the pulse rate.
    Hence these are called "pulse oximeters".

    As should be obvious from looking, both oxygen conditions of blood
    absorb green light pretty strongly. For green light they absorb
    almost the same. So green light can't see a difference.

    It appears Apple put both green and infrared LEDs in the Apple watch.
    I guess green light was chosen to get a stronger signal on the light
    reflected for finding the pulse rate. That leaves the infrared light
    alone to detect the difference oxygenated blood and non. However,
    for near infrared light where oxygenated blood absorbs more, the
    ratio is about two to one. That provides not a lot of signal to work
    with. Further into the infrared there is likely more signal, but then
    silicon photo detectors stop working. Maybe there is an infrared
    color where everything works without driving up the cost. I don't
    know, but they have not done it yet.

    What we do know is that almost everyone else chose red light and
    infrared light for their pulse oximeters. So, living dangerously, I am
    going to predict that unless Apple changes the colors of their optical
    system they will not turn on an oximeter function on the Apple watch.

    There may be some Apple watch "apps" from developers that claim
    to provide an oximeter. Now that you have read the memo, you
    might want to see evidence to support that.


    Thanks,
    rationaltime
    umarrajs likes this.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •