Oh, yeah. And Ginault needs to fire the idiot who wrote the marketing spiel. Did Ginault really think people won't see through BS mumbo jumbo and buzz words? Do we look that stupid?
Prove to any of us that there is a direct correlation between the marketing hype (which was clearly both overblown and suffered from some translation "issues") and the quality of the watch. Don't just take the low road and assume the worst. IMO that is simply being negative and is unwarranted. I have done a bit of research and the company's first model (a sterile homage) was quite well received and I don't think I am overstepping by suggesting that this one is considerably nicer. Had the press on the original model been very poor I think there might be more justification for <cautious> skepticism here. We can all read through the hot air of a marketing spiel and assess the product objectively, right? Check out any number of micro products on Kickstarter and tell me that ain't so.
And for my taste I agree with Hornet a steinhart with swiss movement at $350 or a parnis seems like the way to go to add a sub clone and will give you a lot of extra cash to add something else.
yadda yadda tapatalk
Last edited by hikeNbike; December 23rd, 2016 at 15:52.
/ Oris 65 Diver 40mm / Tudor Pelagos 25500TN / Eterna 1960 Dress Watch / NTH Barracuda Vintage Black
WPAC Member #01
Not my personal cuppa cha, however it takes a huge amount of effort to get to this point in anything pertaining to watches, so good luck with this.
"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf"